Notifications
Clear all

Anyone have experience with shingles that hold up against hail?

348 Posts
342 Users
0 Reactions
10.2 K Views
dieselblizzard154
Posts: 9
(@dieselblizzard154)
Active Member
Joined:

Funny you mention the noise difference—I thought I was imagining it too, but after we switched to impact-resistant shingles (Class 4, I think), the sound of rain is definitely more muted. Used to be, a good downpour would drown out the TV in our living room. Now it’s just a steady background hum. Maybe it’s partly the new underlayment? Our installer swapped out the old felt for some synthetic stuff, and I wonder if that helps with sound as much as water.

On attic temps, I’m with you about color making a difference. We went from dark brown to a lighter tan after our last hail claim, and while I didn’t do any scientific measurements, the upstairs feels less like an oven in July. Still gets hot up there, but not “melt your shoes” hot. I’ve heard some folks say ridge vents or better insulation matter more than shingle color though—anyone actually compare before/after on that?

Insurance is such a wild card. Ours barely moved after upgrading to Class 4s, even though the adjuster made a big deal about how much better they are against hail. Meanwhile my cousin across town got a nice discount just by sending in photos and receipts. Makes me wonder if it’s all down to who picks up your file that day or what mood they’re in.

Curious if anyone’s had issues with warranty claims on these newer shingles? Our roofer said impact-resistant ones can sometimes get cosmetic dings from hail that don’t count as “damage” for insurance or warranty purposes. Seems like you could end up with a roof that looks beat up but technically isn’t covered for replacement... Has that happened to anybody here?


Reply
sophieinventor
Posts: 8
(@sophieinventor)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s spot on about the cosmetic dings—seen it a few times after big hail. The shingles do their job and keep water out, but they end up looking rough. Insurance adjusters usually call it “cosmetic only” and won’t pay out unless there’s actual penetration or loss of function. It’s frustrating, especially when you’ve paid extra for the upgrade. I’ve had folks try to fight it, but unless your policy specifically covers cosmetic damage (some rare ones do), it’s a tough sell. The underlayment swap probably helped with the noise too—synthetic tends to dampen sound better than old-school felt, at least in my experience.


Reply
Posts: 21
(@bailey_rodriguez)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I totally get the frustration with the “cosmetic only” label. We got hit with hail about a year after moving in, and even though our shingles looked like someone took a hammer to them, the adjuster said it was just visual. I kept thinking, what’s the point of paying extra for the fancy impact-resistant ones if they’re still gonna look banged up? But yeah, as long as there’s no leaks or missing chunks, insurance just shrugs.

We did have synthetic underlayment put in when we bought the place—mostly because the roofer talked it up—and I do think it makes a difference with rain noise. The old house I grew up in had that felt stuff, and storms sounded way louder there. Not sure if it’s worth the extra cost for everyone, but I’ve been happy with it so far.

Honestly, I’m still figuring all this out. Nobody tells you how much random stuff you’ll worry about once you own a roof.


Reply
ginger_jones
Posts: 4
(@ginger_jones)
New Member
Joined:

That “cosmetic only” thing drives me nuts too. I’ve managed a few properties with Class 4 impact shingles, and while they don’t leak, they still end up looking rough after a bad hailstorm. Insurance rarely cares unless there’s actual penetration or missing pieces. The synthetic underlayment is a solid move though—definitely quieter during storms, and in my experience, it holds up better if you ever do need to replace shingles. Still, it’s wild how much you end up thinking about roofs once you’re responsible for them... never crossed my mind before this job.


Reply
Posts: 4
(@mclark44)
New Member
Joined:

I get what you mean about the “cosmetic only” thing being frustrating, but I’m not sure I’d call it totally pointless. I’ve seen a couple roofs where the shingles looked pretty beat up after hail—lots of dents and bruises—but the structure underneath was still solid. One time, a neighbor freaked out over how bad their roof looked after a storm, but when we checked it out, there wasn’t any leaking or missing pieces, just a ton of cosmetic marks. Insurance didn’t cover it, but honestly, it still kept the rain out. I guess I’m starting to think that sometimes “ugly but functional” is better than having to replace the whole roof every few years.

About the synthetic underlayment—totally agree, though. We used it on a recent job, and it made a huge difference during a crazy windstorm last month. Way less rattling, and it didn’t tear like felt sometimes does. Still, I wonder if people overthink the look of their shingles when the main thing is just keeping water out...


Reply
Page 6 / 70
Share:
Scroll to Top