Notifications
Clear all

Would Malarkey shingles survive a solar-powered zombie apocalypse?

243 Posts
239 Users
0 Reactions
5,243 Views
chessplayer99
Posts: 18
(@chessplayer99)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on craftsmanship over materials. I’ve seen “premium” shingles fail in under ten years just because the crew cut corners, but I’ve also seen basic three-tabs last ages with regular checks and touch-ups. Still, I wonder about all the chemicals in traditional shingles—if we’re talking apocalypse survival, wouldn’t something like a living roof or metal panels be better for the long haul? Shingles are easy to patch, but I’m not sure they’re the most sustainable choice if you’ve got to ride things out for decades...


Reply
dhernandez93
Posts: 3
(@dhernandez93)
New Member
Joined:

Metal panels definitely hold up longer, but patching them’s a pain if you don’t have the right tools or extra panels lying around. I get what you mean about chemicals in shingles, though—some brands use recycled stuff now, but it’s still not “green.” Living roofs are cool, but honestly, they’re a ton of work to keep alive, especially if you’re low on water or dealing with pests. For pure survival, I’d probably go metal if you can swing the upfront cost and have spares for repairs. Shingles are easier to fix with scraps, though… it’s a toss-up.


Reply
Posts: 12
(@camper28)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I totally get the struggle with metal—my neighbor went that route and every time a branch dents a panel, he’s scrambling to find a match. I’m with you on shingles being easier to patch if you’ve got leftovers, though. For me, budget was the decider. Metal sounded great but just wasn’t doable upfront. My Malarkey shingles have held up better than I expected, even after a couple of gnarly hailstorms. Not perfect, but at least I can slap a patch on when needed without special tools. If you’re handy and don’t mind the occasional repair, shingles aren’t the worst compromise.


Reply
daisycarpenter218
Posts: 9
(@daisycarpenter218)
Active Member
Joined:

For me, budget was the decider. Metal sounded great but just wasn’t doable upfront. My Malarkey shingles have held up better than I expected, even after a couple of gnarly hailstorms. Not perfect, but at least I can slap a patch on when needed without special tools.

That patchability is a big plus, for sure. I’ve been weighing shingles vs. metal too, and honestly, the ease of DIY repairs keeps tipping the scale toward shingles for me. That said, I always wonder about the long-term environmental impact. Shingles are easier to patch, but they do end up in the landfill more often than metal panels, which can be recycled. Have you looked into recycling options for Malarkey shingles if you ever need to do a bigger replacement?

Also, with all this talk about hail and branches, I keep thinking about how green roofs (like sedum mats or even just a moss layer) might actually protect the shingles underneath from minor impacts. It’s not super common in my area, but I’ve seen a few folks try it. Anyone ever experimented with layering something over their shingles to boost their lifespan, especially in rough weather? Just curious if that would help in a “zombie apocalypse” scenario or just make things weirder...


Reply
Posts: 5
(@climber13)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I think you’re onto something with the green roof idea. I’ve seen a neighbor try sedum mats over asphalt and it actually kept things cooler in the summer, plus seemed to cushion hail a bit. Not sure about full zombie-proofing, but it definitely made his roof look less boring. Patchability is a real win, though—sometimes low-tech just works.


Reply
Page 7 / 49
Share:
Scroll to Top