Roofing discussions and local services.

Did you know synthetic slate can actually be lighter than real stone?

262 replies 10.9 K views
 
5 posts

I hear you on the upfront cost - synthetic slate isn’t cheap compared to asphalt. But I’ve seen a few jobs where folks went with it, and years later, it still looked sharp. One client had a real slate roof before, and the weight was a nightmare for their old rafters. Swapping to synthetic saved them a ton on reinforcement work. As for fading, I’ve noticed some brands hold up better than others, especially if you’re not in full sun all day. It’s definitely not a one-size-fits-all thing, but sometimes the long-term headaches are less with synthetic, even if the sticker shock is real at first.


Reply
7 posts

- Had to replace my roof a couple years back - old slate was just too heavy for the rafters, and I didn’t want to mess with extra support.
- Synthetic slate was way lighter, which made install way easier (and cheaper since I skipped all that reinforcement).
- Price tag hurt at first, but honestly, not having to worry about sagging or cracking tiles is worth it.
- Haven’t seen much fading yet, but I’m in the Midwest, so not full sun all day. Curious if folks in hotter spots see more color change?
- Only thing I miss is that “real stone” sound when it rains... but not enough to go back.


Reply
dperez99
17 posts

Only thing I miss is that “real stone” sound when it rains... but not enough to go back.

That’s hilarious - I never thought about the rain sound! I’m still rocking the original asphalt shingles, so my roof just sounds like a drumline during storms. Did you notice any difference in insulation or noise with the synthetic stuff?


Reply
web473
2 posts

Yeah, the sound difference is real. With synthetic slate, you lose that classic “ping” you get from real stone or even metal - honestly, it’s a lot quieter, especially in heavy rain. As for insulation, I’ve noticed it’s a bit better than asphalt, but not a huge jump. The underlayment makes more of a difference for temperature and noise than the shingles themselves, at least in my experience. If you’re after peace and quiet during storms, synthetic’s not a bad move... but if you love that old-school rain-on-stone vibe, it’s definitely not the same.


Reply
3 posts

“If you’re after peace and quiet during storms, synthetic’s not a bad move... but if you love that old-school rain-on-stone vibe, it’s definitely not the same.”

I actually kind of miss that sound, weird as it sounds. Grew up in a house with real slate and storms always felt more dramatic. But I went with synthetic last year - mainly because my roof couldn’t handle the weight of real stone without major reinforcement. It’s way lighter, which made install a lot easier (and cheaper). Haven’t noticed much difference in insulation either, but the quieter rain is a nice bonus when you’re trying to sleep. Still, sometimes I wish it had a bit more character.


Reply

Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

Scroll to Top