Roofing discussions and local services.

When hail meets metal: a suburban legend

907 replies
 

Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

-

Hail is basically nature’s way of pointing out all your shortcuts.
Couldn’t agree more. I’ve seen “temporary” patches last years, and “permanent” fixes fail after one storm.
- Stainless screws are a solid bet, but even those can rust if the coating chips.
- Gutters that don’t clog? Still a myth in my book. Leaf guards help, but then you’re just unclogging the guards instead.
- If your attic sags with Christmas lights, maybe skip the green roof for now... unless you want a rooftop garden in your living room.


Reply
skater641395

Hail’s definitely a stress test for any roof, no matter how “permanent” the fix. I switched to standing seam metal after my asphalt shingles got shredded in a freak June storm - figured I was set for life. Turns out, even that’s not immune. Dents everywhere, and the seams took a beating where I’d used cheaper fasteners on a few panels. Lesson learned: those tiny shortcuts come back to haunt you. And gutters… I’ve tried every guard out there. They just turn into squirrel playgrounds or get jammed with pine needles anyway.


Reply
baileys75

Lesson learned: those tiny shortcuts come back to haunt you.

Ain’t that the truth. I went with a cheaper metal myself, thinking it’d be “good enough” for our Midwest hail. Regret it every spring. Dents aren’t just cosmetic either - water started sneaking in at one seam where the fastener pulled loose. As for gutters, I gave up on guards after squirrels chewed through two brands. Now I just budget for a pro cleanout twice a year. Not perfect, but less hassle than fighting nature (and squirrels).


Reply
sports914

I hear you on the gutter guards. I thought I was clever with those mesh ones - turns out, the local raccoons are even more clever. They just rip them right off. As for metal roofs, I went with the “mid-tier” option thinking it’d be fine for our storms, but after last month’s hail, it looks like a golf ball up there. Not sure if I should laugh or cry every time it rains...


Reply

That raccoon story sounds way too familiar... I gave up on mesh guards after finding one halfway down the driveway. About the metal roof, did your warranty cover hail dents at all? I’ve heard some policies treat cosmetic damage differently than leaks or punctures. I’m in a similar spot - my “hail resistant” shingles didn’t hold up last spring, and now I’m wondering if it’s worth fighting with insurance or just living with the dings. Anyone had luck getting repairs covered for stuff that’s mostly just ugly, not actually leaking?


Reply

- Had a similar debate after our first hailstorm last year - metal roof, lots of little dings but no leaks.
- Warranty fine print was a headache. Ours only covered “functional” damage, so cosmetic dents weren’t included.
- Insurance adjuster basically shrugged at the dents since nothing was actually leaking or broken.
- I ended up just living with the marks... honestly, you can only see them up close.
- Couple neighbors pushed harder with insurance and got partial payouts, but it sounded like a hassle for not much cash.
- If it’s just ugly and not leaking, I’d probably save the energy unless resale value is a big concern for you.


Reply
megan_scott

I’m in the same boat - my metal roof took a beating last spring, but no leaks or real issues. I dug into the warranty too and yeah, “cosmetic” damage is basically ignored unless it’s actually letting water in. Insurance didn’t care either. I thought about pushing harder, but after hearing what my neighbor went through (weeks of back-and-forth for a couple hundred bucks), it just didn’t seem worth it. Unless you’re planning to sell soon and think buyers will care, I’d just let it ride. The dents are only obvious if you’re really looking for them.


Reply
donaldsniper10

That’s pretty much the story with most metal roofs after a hailstorm - unless you’re dealing with leaks or punctures, it’s mostly just a cosmetic headache. I’ve seen folks get all worked up about dents, but honestly, unless you’re up on a ladder with a flashlight, they’re tough to spot from the ground. My own place took a pounding two years ago (golf ball-sized hail, no joke), and I was convinced the roof was trashed. Turns out, just a bunch of dimples - no leaks, no structural issues. Insurance adjuster shrugged and said, “It’s still doing its job.”

I get why people want everything to look perfect, especially if you’re thinking about resale value. But in my experience, most buyers care way more about whether the roof keeps water out than if it’s got a few dings. One neighbor actually tried to get his panels replaced for cosmetic reasons and ended up in a months-long back-and-forth with his insurance. He finally gave up when he realized the payout wouldn’t even cover his deductible.

Curious if anyone here has actually had luck getting cosmetic damage covered? Or maybe found a contractor who could “massage” the dents out without replacing whole panels? I’ve heard mixed things - some say it’s possible, others say it’s not worth the hassle or cost. Also, does anyone notice more noise from rain after hail dents, or is that just in my head? My wife swears it sounds louder now, but I can’t tell if she’s right or just annoyed by the whole ordeal.

Anyway, I’m leaning toward leaving mine as-is unless something starts leaking. But I do wonder if there’s a point where too many dents could actually weaken the panels over time... anyone run into that?


Reply
dance_emily

That sounds a lot like what happened at my uncle’s place last spring - he was all set to fight the insurance company over a bunch of hail dents, but after a couple months of back and forth, he just let it go. No leaks, no rust, just some dimples you’d never notice unless you’re really looking. I get the worry about resale, but honestly, most folks around here expect a few dings after a big storm. As for the noise, I swear my cousin’s convinced their roof is louder now too, but I can’t tell the difference. Maybe it’s just one of those things you notice more once you’re thinking about it. If it’s not leaking, I’d probably leave it alone too.


Reply
sdust63

- Metal roofs are built to take a beating. Dents from hail are mostly cosmetic unless you see cracks or exposed fasteners.
-

“No leaks, no rust, just some dimples you’d never notice unless you’re really looking.”
That’s spot on - most buyers in hail-prone areas know what to expect.
- Noise difference is usually in people’s heads unless panels got loosened up. If there’s no water getting in, I’d agree - probably not worth the hassle to chase insurance for minor dings.
- Keep an eye out for paint loss or sharp creases, though. Those can be trouble down the line, but small dents? Not a big deal in my book.


Reply
art624

I’ve seen a lot of folks get worked up over hail dents, but in my experience, unless you’re seeing chipped paint or the seams are starting to pull apart, it’s mostly just a cosmetic thing. I do wonder, though - has anyone actually had issues with insurance refusing to cover later leaks because of “pre-existing hail damage”? I’ve heard stories both ways. Sometimes adjusters will point at old dings and say it’s not their problem, even if the leak is clearly from something else.

Also, curious if anyone’s noticed certain colors or finishes showing wear faster after hail? I inspected a dark green roof last month that had way more visible scuffs than a lighter one down the street, even though both got hit by the same storm. Maybe it’s just how the light hits it, but it made me think twice about color choices for metal.

Anyone ever see a dent actually turn into a rust spot years later, or is that just another suburban legend?


Reply
vegan990

I’ve actually got a dent or two on my garage roof from a hailstorm a few years back - no rust yet, but I do keep an eye on them. My neighbor swears his red metal roof shows every scuff, while mine’s a dull gray and hides most of it. Insurance did try to blame “previous damage” when I had a leak last year, but after some back-and-forth (and a lot of photos), they finally covered it. Guess it depends who you get on the phone that day...


Reply

That color difference is real - darker roofs seem to hide the dings better, but I’ve seen some light gray panels that show every little scratch if the sun hits just right. When I check hail dents, I usually run my hand along the panel, then look from a low angle for shadows. Insurance can be tricky… I once had a client who had to dig up old inspection reports just to prove the dents weren’t “pre-existing.” Photos help, but sometimes it comes down to persistence.


Reply
jackcosplayer7700

That’s spot on about the color - darker panels definitely hide more, but I’ve had tenants complain about every little mark on lighter roofs, especially after a hailstorm. It’s wild how much more obvious those dings are when the sun’s low in the sky. I’ve found that even with photos, insurance adjusters can be a pain. They’ll nitpick over what’s “old damage” versus new, and sometimes it feels like they’re just looking for a reason to deny a claim.

One thing I’ve started doing is keeping a running log of roof inspections, with dates and quick notes. It’s not perfect, but it’s saved me a headache or two when questions come up. Curious if anyone’s had luck with drone photos for documentation? I’ve thought about trying it, but not sure if it’s worth the hassle or if adjusters even take them seriously.


Reply
food6459487

Curious if anyone’s had luck with drone photos for documentation? I’ve thought about trying it, but not sure if it’s worth the hassle or if adjusters even take them seriously.

I tried the drone thing last year after a nasty hailstorm - mostly because I was tired of climbing up there myself. The pics looked decent, but my insurance guy barely glanced at them. He still wanted his own “official” inspection, so it felt a bit pointless. That said, it’s handy for your own records, especially if you can snap shots before and after storms. Just don’t expect adjusters to give them much weight unless you get super detailed.


Reply

Just don’t expect adjusters to give them much weight unless you get super detailed.

That’s kind of what I was worried about. I like the idea of having my own “before and after” shots, but if the insurance folks don’t really care, it’s hard to justify the cost of a drone. Has anyone actually had an adjuster accept drone pics as proof for a claim? Or is it just for peace of mind?


Reply
aquantum70

Has anyone actually had an adjuster accept drone pics as proof for a claim? Or is it just for peace of mind?

Had a hail claim last year - metal roof, Texas. I sent drone shots along with close-ups from the ground. Adjuster barely glanced at the drone pics, wanted to see the dents up close. For me, drone was more about documenting for my own records than swaying the insurance folks. Not saying it’s useless, but don’t expect it to be a magic bullet.


Reply

I tried the drone thing after a hailstorm last spring - figured it’d impress the adjuster. Nope. He was more interested in my ladder and a flashlight than any aerial shots. Honestly, drones are cool for wide shots, but they just don’t show dents well enough.


Reply
podcaster73

Drones are getting hyped up in the inspection world, but I’m with you - when it comes to hail dents, they just don’t cut it. I’ve tried using a drone for roof inspections a few times, mostly out of curiosity and, yeah, to avoid dragging my gear up a steep pitch. The wide shots look great, but any kind of subtle damage? It’s just not visible unless you’re basically hovering a foot above the shingles - and even then, shadows and glare mess with the detail.

Last year, after a nasty storm, a client wanted a “high-tech” report with drone photos. We did both: drone shots and the old-school walk-and-chalk. Adjuster barely glanced at the drone images. He wanted to see the actual granule loss, the tiny dings, the stuff you only spot when you’re up close with a light at an angle. I get why - insurance folks need proof that’s hard to dispute, and those little dents just don’t pop on aerials.

I do think drones have their place, especially for steep or fragile roofs where walking isn’t safe. They’re also handy for showing clients the overall condition or for spotting obvious things like missing shingles, big branches, or pooling water. But for hail, especially on metal, you need to see the surface up close. Sometimes there’s no shortcut for climbing up there yourself.

Funny how the “legend” of drones solving everything keeps going, though. Maybe in a few years the tech will get better, but for now, I’m still packing my ladder and flashlight.


Reply
david_rebel

I’ve run into the same thing with drone inspections, especially after hail storms. The first time I tried using one, I thought it’d be a game-changer - no more sketchy ladders on 12/12 pitches, right? But when I got back and looked at the footage, all those tiny dings on the metal panels just blended in. Even with 4K video, you miss the little stuff. I remember one job where the homeowner was convinced their roof was fine because the drone shots looked “clean.” Once we got up there in person, though, it was a different story - dozens of little dents you could only spot by running your hand over the surface at an angle.

I get why people want to believe drones can do it all. They’re flashy and make for cool reports. But in my experience, nothing beats getting up close - especially with metal roofs. Maybe someday they’ll have some kind of AI that can pick out dents in real time, but for now, I’m still lugging my ladder around too.


Reply
Scroll to Top