Notifications
Clear all

Mounting solar panels: go with traditional flashing or try those newer deck-mounted seals?

140 Posts
136 Users
0 Reactions
841 Views
knitter933365
Posts: 1
(@knitter933365)
New Member
Joined:

I was super skeptical about those deck seals too, but my neighbor put them in last year and they survived our lovely freeze-thaw rollercoaster without a hitch. I still lean toward flashing for peace of mind, but honestly, the new seals aren’t the gamble they used to be. Just gotta follow the install steps to the letter... which is harder than it sounds when you’re on a roof in February.


Reply
sophieskater588
Posts: 15
(@sophieskater588)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of those newer deck-mounted seals, especially when you see them holding up through a rough winter. But I’m still not totally sold, at least not for my place. My roof’s got a pretty low pitch and we get a ton of wind-driven rain here, so I’m always a little paranoid about water sneaking in somewhere down the line. Maybe it’s overkill, but I just feel better with traditional flashing—there’s something about that extra layer of metal tucked under the shingles that makes me sleep easier.

Last year, I helped my cousin put up panels on his old ranch house. He went with the deck seals because his installer swore by them and said they’d cut down on install time. They did go in faster, but we had to be super careful about torqueing everything just right and making sure the sealant was applied perfectly. One missed step and you’re basically relying on a gasket to keep your attic dry for 25+ years... That made me nervous.

With flashing, yeah, it’s more work—especially if you’re doing it yourself and have to lift shingles without breaking them (which is its own headache if your roof is older or brittle). But once it’s in, you’ve got gravity working for you and water has to work a lot harder to find its way in.

I guess it comes down to how much risk you’re willing to take and what kind of weather your roof faces. If I had a newer roof or lived somewhere drier, maybe I’d feel differently. For now, though, I’ll stick with flashing—even if it means cursing at stubborn shingles for an afternoon.

Curious if anyone’s seen long-term results (like 5+ years) with those deck seals in really wet climates? That might change my mind eventually...


Reply
wleaf37
Posts: 2
(@wleaf37)
New Member
Joined:

I’m in a similar boat—my place is on the coast and we get sideways rain half the year. I’ve seen deck seals work fine for a few seasons, but five years? Not sure I’d trust just a gasket that long, especially with all the expansion and contraction. Flashing’s a pain, but at least you can see what’s going on if you ever need to check. Maybe I’m just old school, but water always finds the weak spot...


Reply
samr54
Posts: 1
(@samr54)
New Member
Joined:

I get what you’re saying about water always finding a way in, especially with coastal weather beating up your roof year after year. But honestly, I’ve seen some of the newer deck-mounted seal systems hold up surprisingly well—assuming they’re installed right and the roof’s in decent shape to start with. The big issue I run into isn’t so much the gasket wearing out in five years, but people not checking up on them at all. Out of sight, out of mind, then suddenly there’s a leak.

Here’s how I look at it: If you’re the type who stays on top of maintenance and doesn’t mind popping up there once a year to check things over, the deck seals can be a solid option. They’re fast to install and don’t disturb as many shingles or tiles. On the other hand, if you want to “set it and forget it,” flashing is still the safer bet long-term, even if it’s more of a pain up front.

I wouldn’t trust either system if your roof’s already got issues or is nearing end-of-life though...no seal or flashing can fix rotten decking or brittle shingles. Just my two cents from what I see during inspections.


Reply
dclark32
Posts: 2
(@dclark32)
New Member
Joined:

You nailed it with the “out of sight, out of mind” thing—most folks just don’t think about what’s under the panels until it’s too late. I’ve got a 12-year-old composite shingle roof, and when I went solar last year, the installer pushed hard for the deck-mounted seals. I hesitated at first because I grew up in a house where we had to chase leaks every winter thanks to some slapdash skylight flashing. But after doing my homework (and crawling around my own attic more times than I care to admit), I ended up going with the deck seals.

I check them every fall when I clean out the gutters. So far, not a hint of moisture in the attic—even after two nor’easters and some serious wind-driven rain. My neighbor, on the other hand, went with traditional flashing five years ago and hasn’t touched his roof since. His system’s bone-dry too, but he did mention installation was a mess—tore up a lot of shingles that never quite laid flat again.

Honestly, it comes down to how much you trust your installer and how hands-on you’re willing to be. If you’re comfortable climbing up there once in a while, those deck seals are way less invasive and look cleaner in my opinion. But yeah, if your roof is already questionable or you want zero maintenance for 20 years, flashing is probably worth the hassle.

One thing nobody really talks about: warranties. My solar company only covers leaks if you use their preferred system and send annual photos as proof of inspection—kind of a pain but at least they stand behind it if something goes sideways.

Either way, you’re right that nothing’s going to save a worn-out roof. Had a buddy try to “patch” his way through with fancy seals on crumbly old shingles...he ended up re-roofing two years later anyway. Not worth it.

Good on you for pointing out the maintenance angle—too many people skip that part and pay for it later.


Reply
Page 28 / 28
Share:
Scroll to Top