Notifications
Clear all

Mounting solar panels: go with traditional flashing or try those newer deck-mounted seals?

153 Posts
148 Users
0 Reactions
4,121 Views
Posts: 6
(@marleysinger)
Active Member
Joined:

“I’d rather deal with some extra noise than hidden leaks under the panels... Seen too many folks regret cutting corners there.”

That’s exactly it—leaks are a nightmare, especially if you’re trying to keep things green and avoid unnecessary repairs. I get the appeal of those deck-mounted seals for speed, but I’ve seen them fail after a couple of rough winters up here in Vermont. Anyone tried combining flashing with eco-friendly sealants? Wondering if that’s overkill or actually worth it for long-term peace of mind.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@coffee719)
Active Member
Joined:

- Seen both setups—deck-mounted seals are quicker, but I’ve had callbacks after a couple years, especially on low-slope roofs where water just sits.
- Flashing with a quality sealant (I’ve used the green stuff from ChemLink) holds up better in freeze/thaw cycles. Not overkill if you’re in a spot with heavy snow or ice dams.
- Downside: it’s slower and costs more up front, but you avoid chasing leaks later. Had one job where a deck seal failed mid-winter and it was a nightmare to fix under snow.
- Some folks swear by the newer “peel-and-stick” flashing tapes under the mounts—anyone tried those with solar installs? Curious if they actually hold up or just marketing hype.
- For what it’s worth, I’d rather spend an extra day on install than risk hidden rot. Anyone else dealing with ice dam issues making this decision even harder?


Reply
Posts: 2
(@matthewf12)
New Member
Joined:

Not gonna lie, I used to think the deck-mounted seals were the way to go—just slap 'em on and call it a day. But after helping patch up a buddy’s garage last winter (water found its way in through one of those “quick” seals), I’m starting to see why folks stick with old-school flashing, even if it’s a pain. That said, I’m not totally convinced the peel-and-stick tapes are just hype. We tried them on a couple test installs at the shop—one on my uncle’s place, which is basically a wind tunnel in January—and so far, no leaks or weird bubbling. Granted, it’s only been a year, so who knows long-term.

One thing I will say: on steep roofs, I’ve seen deck seals hold up better than expected, but on low slopes where snow piles up, it’s a gamble. Ice dams are a nightmare no matter what you use, though. I had to chip away at a frozen mount last February—felt like I was in a bad home improvement show. If you’re dealing with constant freeze/thaw, I’d lean toward flashing, but I wouldn’t write off the tapes just yet.


Reply
Posts: 10
(@rocky_writer)
Active Member
Joined:

Man, I hear you on the ice dam struggle—been there, chipping away at frozen mounts with numb fingers. Honestly, I think you nailed it: flashing is a pain but it’s solid, especially with all the freeze/thaw we get. Still, those tapes are tempting for speed. I’m curious how they’ll hold up after a few more winters, but it’s cool you’re testing both. Sometimes you just gotta see what actually survives the weather, right?


Reply
Posts: 3
(@singer96)
New Member
Joined:

I get why the tapes look appealing—faster install, less mess, and on paper they claim solid waterproofing. But in practice, I’ve seen a few roofs where those deck-mounted seals started peeling or cracking after just a couple of harsh winters. Especially with older asphalt shingles, once moisture gets under there, you’re looking at hidden rot or mold down the line. Flashing’s a hassle, sure, but at least you can see when it starts to fail. Tapes and gaskets... not so much. Maybe they’ll improve, but I’m still a bit skeptical for climates with heavy freeze/thaw cycles.


Reply
Page 26 / 31
Share:
Scroll to Top