Notifications
Clear all

Which holds up better over time: felt or synthetic underlayment?

454 Posts
440 Users
0 Reactions
8,169 Views
sky_davis
Posts: 1
(@sky_davis)
New Member
Joined:

I hear you on the felt flying everywhere—had a job last spring where we spent more time chasing it than laying it down. But I’ve also had synthetic wrinkle up so bad in the sun that it looked like a potato chip bag. One thing I’ve noticed is, if you’re working on a steep pitch, synthetic’s grippier underfoot (unless it’s wet, then it’s like ice). For long delays or unpredictable weather, I’d rather deal with the quirks of synthetic than risk redoing half the work. But yeah, if you can shingle same day, felt’s hard to beat for speed and price.


Reply
anthony_joker
Posts: 10
(@anthony_joker)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of felt for quick jobs, especially if you’re sure you’ll have shingles down before the weather turns. But honestly, I think both options have their headaches—felt blows around and tears, synthetic wrinkles and can get slick. What gets me is how little either option really addresses long-term durability or environmental impact.

Here’s where I’ll push back a bit: if we’re talking about what holds up *over time*, neither traditional felt nor most synthetics are really built to last more than a few months exposed. I’ve seen plenty of roofs where the underlayment was shot long before the shingles were ready to be replaced. And when you factor in disposal, felt’s basically landfill fodder, and most synthetics aren’t much better—just more plastic piling up.

I started using recycled-fiber underlayments a couple years ago (think recycled polyester blends), and while they cost more upfront, they’ve held up better in weird weather swings—less curling, less tearing, and they don’t turn into a slip-and-slide the second there’s dew. Plus, some of them are actually designed to break down faster or be recycled again, which feels like a step in the right direction.

Not saying they’re perfect—nothing is—but if you’re looking at the big picture (durability *and* footprint), it’s worth considering alternatives outside the usual felt vs. synthetic debate. Upfront cost stings a bit, but I’d rather pay for something that won’t just end up in a landfill after one hailstorm or heatwave.

Curious if anyone else has tried these newer options? I’m in the Midwest, so we get everything from ice to 100-degree days... so far, no regrets on making the switch.


Reply
Posts: 11
(@tech289)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s interesting about the recycled-fiber stuff—haven’t tried it myself, but I’m curious how it handled heavy wind-driven rain. Did you notice any seepage or edge curling after a bad storm? Around here (southern plains), I’ve seen synthetics hold up okay, but they get slick as ice when wet and can be a pain during install. Wondering if the recycled blends are any better for traction or if it’s more or less the same story.


Reply
Posts: 3
(@jonw49)
New Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from—those synthetic sheets can turn into a skating rink when they’re wet, and that’s no joke if you’re up there trying to keep your footing. I’ve tested a few recycled-fiber underlayments after a couple of nasty spring storms (I’m in north Texas), and here’s what I noticed: edge curling was less of an issue than with old-school felt, but I did see some minor seepage at the seams where we didn’t overlap enough. Nothing catastrophic, but it’s something to watch.

Traction-wise, the recycled stuff felt a bit grippier than the slick synthetics, especially when there was dew or light rain. Not perfect, but I wasn’t sliding around as much. Still, if you get a real gully-washer with wind, any underlayment can get compromised if it’s not fastened down tight or if you’ve got exposed edges.

Honestly, every material has its trade-offs. I’d say the recycled blends are worth a shot for traction alone, but don’t expect miracles in a full-on storm unless your install is buttoned up tight. Good luck if you give it a try—curious to hear how it goes in your neck of the woods.


Reply
scotti85
Posts: 10
(@scotti85)
Active Member
Joined:

I’m with you on the recycled blends being a step up for traction—those synthetic sheets are like ice skates when it’s damp, and I’ve had my share of “whoops” moments. But I still wonder about long-term durability. The eco-friendly stuff sounds great, but does it really hold up after a few years of Texas sun and hail? I’ve seen some of those recycled underlayments get brittle faster than expected. Maybe it’s just the brands I tried, but I’m not totally sold yet. Still, anything that keeps me from sliding off the roof is worth considering...


Reply
Page 79 / 91
Share:
Scroll to Top