Notifications
Clear all

Why does every car brand have their own weird shade of red?

639 Posts
616 Users
0 Reactions
11.2 K Views
donna_gamer2469
Posts: 8
(@donna_gamer2469)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a cherry red pickup for years—looked sharp at first, but yeah, the sun did a number on it. Thing is, I’ve also had a blue one fade just as bad. Maybe it’s not just reds that get roasted? I will say, my neighbor’s red sedan still looks decent after five years, but he babies it with wax and a car cover. I guess if you’re willing to put in the work, those bold colors can last... but I’m way too lazy for all that. White hides the dirt and the fading, so that’s where I landed.


Reply
climber37
Posts: 8
(@climber37)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve noticed the same thing with color fading, and honestly, it’s not just reds that take a beating. I had a metallic gray truck once and even that started looking chalky after a few summers parked outside. Here’s how I see it: 1) Sun exposure is brutal on any color, but reds and blues seem to show it faster. 2) Paint quality and clear coat matter a ton—some brands just cheap out. 3) Maintenance helps, but who really wants to wax every month? Out of curiosity, has anyone tried those ceramic coatings? Wondering if they actually help slow down the fade or if it’s just hype...


Reply
Posts: 15
(@finn_turner)
Active Member
Joined:

Ceramic coatings are everywhere now, but I’m not convinced they’re the magic bullet people claim. I had a buddy who dropped a chunk of change on one for his Mustang—looked great for a while, but after two years in the Texas sun, the red still faded. Maybe it slowed things down a bit, but it didn’t stop it. I think a lot of it comes down to how thick the clear coat is from the factory. Some brands just skimp, and no coating’s gonna fix that.

Honestly, I’d rather see automakers invest in better UV protection up front instead of expecting owners to shell out for extra products. Anyone else notice certain brands seem to hold up better? My old Honda kept its color way longer than my neighbor’s Ford, and we both parked outside. Is it just luck of the draw, or are some manufacturers actually using better paint tech?


Reply
Posts: 14
(@camper98)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s pretty much been my experience too. My wife’s old Mazda 3 (bright red) sat outside for years and barely faded, but my brother’s Chevy truck started looking pink after just a couple summers. I’ve always wondered if it’s not just the clear coat thickness but also the actual pigment quality or maybe even how many layers they use at the factory. I tried a DIY ceramic kit on my Accord and it definitely made washing easier, but I can’t say it kept the color any richer. Seems like some brands just cheap out on paint, especially on lower trims.


Reply
ryant22
Posts: 5
(@ryant22)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve always wondered if it’s not just the clear coat thickness but also the actual pigment quality or maybe even how many layers they use at the factory.

You’re definitely onto something with pigment quality and layer count. From what I’ve seen after years of storm inspections, some manufacturers really do cut corners on lower trims—less clear coat, cheaper pigments, sometimes even skipping a base layer. That’s why you’ll see one red car hold up for a decade while another fades out in two summers.

Red pigments are notoriously unstable under UV, especially the organic ones used for brighter shades. Mazda’s “Soul Red” is actually a multi-layer process with special flakes and extra clear, which helps it last. Chevy’s older reds were often single-stage or just had a thin clear, so they’d oxidize fast.

Ceramic coatings help with surface grime and minor scratches, but they can’t really compensate for poor pigment stability underneath. If you’re worried about fading, regular waxing or a pro-grade ceramic is about as good as it gets unless you want to garage it all the time. It’s wild how much difference there is between brands—and even between trims of the same model.


Reply
Page 85 / 128
Share:
Scroll to Top