Notifications
Clear all

is it just me or are roofs wearing out faster these days?

304 Posts
289 Users
0 Reactions
5,563 Views
Posts: 11
(@bearm94)
Active Member
Joined:

I've seen this happen a lot lately, and honestly, it's not always about the brand. Installation quality is huge—I've fixed roofs from top-tier brands that were poorly installed and failing after just a few years. Ventilation matters too; poor attic airflow can cook shingles from underneath, causing early curling and granule loss. Still, I do wonder sometimes if manufacturers are quietly tweaking their formulas to cut costs... wouldn't surprise me these days.


Reply
anthonysailor
Posts: 19
(@anthonysailor)
Active Member
Joined:

- Agree on installation—seen plenty of "premium" roofs fail early due to careless installs.
- Ventilation's definitely overlooked; attic heat buildup ruins shingles faster than most realize.
- Skeptical about formula tweaks, though... seems risky for manufacturers, but who knows these days.
- Anyway, good points overall. Proper install and airflow usually matter more than brand alone.


Reply
marley_campbell
Posts: 7
(@marley_campbell)
Active Member
Joined:

"Ventilation's definitely overlooked; attic heat buildup ruins shingles faster than most realize."

That hits home for me. Just last summer, I inspected a house where the shingles were barely 10 years old but already curling and brittle. At first glance, it seemed like poor-quality materials—but once I got into the attic, it felt like stepping into an oven. Almost zero airflow, soffit vents blocked by insulation, and just one undersized roof vent... no wonder the shingles were cooked.

Still, I'm curious about these supposed formula tweaks manufacturers might be making. Has anyone actually seen solid evidence or testing data on that? I mean, I get why they'd want to cut costs or improve margins, but wouldn't they risk their reputation big-time if roofs started failing left and right?

Anyway, from what I've seen out in the field, it's almost always installation shortcuts or ventilation mistakes causing premature failures. But who knows—maybe there's more going on behind the scenes than we realize...


Reply
Posts: 12
(@film781)
Active Member
Joined:

You're spot-on about ventilation issues. I've seen plenty of roofs that looked prematurely aged, and almost every time, attic heat was a big factor. Not sure about the formula tweaks either—could be something there, but honestly, most of the time it's just poor installation or shortcuts. Manufacturers messing with formulas seems risky, but who knows... stranger things have happened. Either way, your attic experience sounds painfully familiar.


Reply
Posts: 11
(@comics124)
Active Member
Joined:

You're definitely onto something with ventilation. I've inspected a ton of attics, and it's surprising how often poor airflow is the culprit behind worn shingles. Formula tweaks could play a small role—but honestly, from what I've seen, it's usually shortcuts taken during installation. You'd be amazed how many roofers skip or skimp on ridge vents or soffit ventilation...makes a huge difference down the line. Hang in there, you're not alone dealing with this headache.


Reply
Page 44 / 61
Share:
Scroll to Top