Notifications
Clear all

Roofing roulette: whose warranty saves the day?

338 Posts
316 Users
0 Reactions
1,707 Views
Posts: 4
(@william_seeker)
New Member
Joined:

Had a similar thing happen with storm damage claims—homeowner swore up and down their warranty covered everything, but turns out the fine print disagreed. Makes me wonder...do manufacturers intentionally bank on folks skipping maintenance? Feels like warranties are more about protecting them than us sometimes, haha. Definitely agree though, keeping detailed records is key. Learned that one the hard way myself.

Reply
tcoder50
Posts: 4
(@tcoder50)
New Member
Joined:

You're spot-on about warranties often being more manufacturer-friendly than homeowner-friendly. I've seen plenty of cases where homeowners genuinely believed they were covered, only to find out later that something as minor as skipping an annual inspection voided their entire warranty. Manufacturers definitely know most folks aren't reading every line of fine print, and unfortunately, that's where the trouble starts.

Detailed records really do make all the difference—I've had clients who meticulously documented maintenance and inspections, and when issues arose, their claims went through smoothly. On the flip side, I've also seen homeowners left high and dry because they couldn't prove they'd kept up with required maintenance. It's frustrating, but it's the reality we deal with in this industry.

Glad you learned from your experience though; sometimes those tough lessons are the ones that stick with us the longest.

Reply
running710
Posts: 6
(@running710)
Active Member
Joined:

"Manufacturers definitely know most folks aren't reading every line of fine print, and unfortunately, that's where the trouble starts."

Exactly this. Learned early on to snap pics of everything—inspections, minor repairs, dates scribbled on invoices... saved me more than once. Pain in the neck, but worth it.

Reply
Posts: 8
(@kathyseeker699)
Active Member
Joined:

Haha, snapping pics is smart—wish I'd learned that sooner. I remember a few years back, we had a roof leak at one of our properties. Warranty was supposed to cover it, but when I called the manufacturer, they started rattling off clauses and sub-clauses like it was Shakespeare or something. Turns out, because we missed one tiny inspection (which was buried in paragraph 17b or whatever), warranty was void. Ended up costing us a pretty penny.

Ever since then, I've become the fine-print whisperer. I joke with my crew that if property management doesn't pan out, I could probably get a job proofreading warranties. But seriously, keeping detailed records and photos has saved me more headaches than aspirin ever could. It's tedious, sure, but beats playing warranty roulette any day.

Reply
sophiebeekeeper
Posts: 7
(@sophiebeekeeper)
Active Member
Joined:

"Turns out, because we missed one tiny inspection (which was buried in paragraph 17b or whatever), warranty was void."

Man, I feel your pain on that one. As someone who inspects homes for a living, I've seen warranties that seem intentionally designed to trip people up. Honestly, sometimes I wonder if manufacturers count on folks missing those obscure clauses just to dodge responsibility.

One thing I've noticed is that even when you do everything right—photos, inspections, paperwork—some companies still try to wiggle out of coverage. My advice? Don't just document the issue itself; document your maintenance and inspections too. A quick timestamped photo or email confirming an inspection can be a lifesaver later on. And if you're ever unsure about warranty terms, don't hesitate to ask questions upfront. Better to annoy them with questions now than argue over fine print later...

Reply
Page 33 / 68
Share:
Scroll to Top