- Honestly, I lean toward smoother footage for most of my listings. Here’s why:
- Buyers get a clearer sense of the space—no distractions from shaky hands or weird angles.
- When I’ve shown rougher, handheld videos, people sometimes ask if there’s something wrong with the place (like, “Why does it look so dark or cramped?”).
- Gimbal stabilizers help with tight hallways and stairs—less risk of making viewers dizzy.
- That said, I get the appeal of a more “real” vibe. Sometimes a little shake feels authentic, but too much can look sloppy or unprofessional.
- For inspections, though, I want things as clear as possible. If there’s an issue on the roof or siding, I’d rather see it in crisp detail than have it blurred by camera movement.
- Maybe it depends on your audience? Some folks want HGTV-level polish, others just want to see the truth—warts and all.
- In my experience, a gimbal doesn’t have to make things look fake if you don’t overdo it. Just keeps things steady enough that people focus on the house, not the camerawork.
I get wanting smooth footage, but honestly, I just use a basic shoulder mount and save the cash. If you keep your steps slow and plan your route, it stays steady enough for most folks. Gimbals are nice, but for one-off videos or quick walkthroughs, I’d rather not deal with the setup or extra cost. Plus, I kinda like that “real” feel—makes it obvious I’m not hiding anything.