Notifications
Clear all

Trying to pick a shingle that won’t cook my attic—Malarkey worth it?

344 Posts
329 Users
0 Reactions
12.2 K Views
dmartin15
Posts: 18
(@dmartin15)
Active Member
Joined:

- Not totally convinced shingle color alone does much, but I’ll admit our old black roof was like a frying pan in August.
- We’re debating lighter shingles now, but the price jump for the “cool” ones is kinda wild.
- Haven’t tried spray foam, mostly because the horror stories about trapped moisture freak me out... Mold is not on my to-do list.
- Seems like it’s a mix—better shingles, more vents, maybe some insulation if the budget survives.
- Anyone else notice the “cool” shingles looking a little dingy after a few years? Or is that just me being picky?


Reply
Posts: 8
(@donaldstone90)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally get the sticker shock on those “cool” shingles. I looked at Malarkey and a couple others, and the price jump was more than I expected.
- We had a black roof before too—could literally feel the heat radiating in the attic. Switched to a lighter gray last year, and it’s *maybe* a little better? Hard to say if it’s worth the extra cost though.
- Noticed what you mentioned about them looking dingy. Ours started out nice but after two summers, there’s some streaking and dirt that really shows up on the lighter color. Might just be our trees dropping stuff, but it bugs me more than I thought it would.
- Spray foam freaks me out for the same reason—heard too many stories about moisture issues and crazy expensive fixes if something goes wrong.
- Ended up adding a couple more vents instead of going all-in on insulation or fancy shingles. Cheaper, and seemed to help with airflow at least a bit.
- If I had to do it again, I’d probably just stick with mid-range shingles and focus on ventilation/insulation where possible... The “cool” label feels like marketing sometimes, unless you’re in a super hot climate.


Reply
Posts: 7
(@climbing_barbara)
Active Member
Joined:

If I had to do it again, I’d probably just stick with mid-range shingles and focus on ventilation/insulation where possible... The “cool” label feels like marketing sometimes, unless you’re in a super hot climate.

That’s pretty much where I landed too. I spent weeks comparing the “cool” shingles numbers, but when you factor in actual cost and how much of a difference you feel in the attic, it’s not always as dramatic as the brochures suggest—especially if you’re not in Arizona or Texas. Adding vents gave me a bigger bang for my buck. Maintenance on lighter colors is a pain, though; I didn’t expect pollen stains to show up that much. Sometimes the simple fixes do more than the expensive upgrades.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@sghost38)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the hesitation, but I actually saw a noticeable drop in upstairs temps after switching to “cool” shingles—even here in the Midwest.

The “cool” label feels like marketing sometimes, unless you’re in a super hot climate.
Maybe not worth it everywhere, but I wouldn’t write them off entirely. Maintenance on the lighter shades is annoying though... can’t argue there.


Reply
vintage733
Posts: 6
(@vintage733)
Active Member
Joined:

The lighter shades definitely show every leaf and bird dropping, but I’ll take that over a sauna upstairs any day. I’ve managed a few buildings with “cool” shingles—some tenants swear the AC runs less, others say they can’t tell. Did you notice any difference in your energy bills, or was it just the temp? I’m curious if it’s worth the hassle for our older properties with questionable insulation...


Reply
Page 56 / 69
Share:
Scroll to Top