Notifications
Clear all

TOUGHER ROOF OR JUST GOOD ENOUGH? NEED HELP DECIDING

227 Posts
221 Users
0 Reactions
1,915 Views
Posts: 2
(@diyer79)
New Member
Joined:

Had a similar debate with myself a few years back. Ended up going with mid-range architectural shingles instead of metal, mostly because I just couldn’t justify the extra cost for my area (Midwest, lots of hail and wind). The warranty looked great on paper, but when I actually read the fine print, it was full of exclusions—especially if the install wasn’t perfect. In my case, I focused more on finding a crew with solid references and then just budgeted for regular inspections after big storms. So far, that’s worked out better than chasing the “lifetime” label.


Reply
sarah_wolf
Posts: 7
(@sarah_wolf)
Active Member
Joined:

-

“The warranty looked great on paper, but when I actually read the fine print, it was full of exclusions—especially if the install wasn’t perfect.”

That’s a big one. Even “lifetime” warranties can get tricky if install isn’t spot-on.
- Good call focusing on a solid crew—install matters way more than brand sometimes.
- Regular inspections after storms is smart, especially with Midwest hail.
- Metal can be overkill for some budgets, but if you ever get tired of shingle repairs, might be worth a look down the road.
- Seen folks regret chasing the fanciest label instead of just getting a reliable install and keeping up with maintenance.


Reply
Posts: 9
(@drake_trekker)
Active Member
Joined:

Warranties can be a headache—seen plenty of folks surprised when a claim gets denied over a minor install detail. Curious, are you leaning toward shingles again or thinking about metal? Midwest hail can be brutal, but sometimes the upfront cost of metal just isn’t doable.


Reply
Posts: 16
(@phoenixmetalworker)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally agree on warranties—seen a lot of claims denied just because a vent wasn’t flashed right or nails weren’t placed exactly as specified.
- Metal’s great for hail, but yeah, the upfront cost can sting. Some folks go with impact-resistant shingles as a middle ground.
- One thing I notice: even with metal, if the underlayment isn’t solid, leaks still happen. It’s not always a set-it-and-forget-it deal.
- Midwest weather’s rough on roofs, no matter what you pick. Just make sure whoever installs it follows the manufacturer’s specs to the letter... that’s what keeps the warranty valid.


Reply
adventure668
Posts: 5
(@adventure668)
Active Member
Joined:

Warranties are a bit of a joke sometimes—one tiny thing off and suddenly you’re out of luck. I’ve managed a few properties where we did everything “by the book” (or so we thought), only to have a claim denied because someone missed a line in the manual about nail spacing. It’s almost like they’re just waiting for an excuse.

I’m with you on metal being solid for hail, but honestly, I’ve seen some pretty rough leaks even with metal roofs just because the underlayment wasn’t done right. Folks think they’re buying peace of mind, but if your crew cuts corners... well, you’ll be up there with a bucket either way.

The cost difference is no joke, either. Last year, I had to choose between metal and those impact shingles for a rental in Nebraska—went with the shingles because tenants don’t love the noise during storms, and it was a lot less upfront. Still, I’m not convinced there’s ever a “perfect” roof for Midwest weather. You just try to stack the odds in your favor and hope the installer actually reads the instructions this time.


Reply
Page 23 / 46
Share:
Scroll to Top