Notifications
Clear all

When the leaves fight back: a suburban drain mystery

244 Posts
235 Users
0 Reactions
994 Views
writing226
Posts: 1
(@writing226)
New Member
Joined:

My concern is if you end up with a layer of wet leaves sitting on the mesh, you’re still up on the ladder every fall, just scraping off a different kind of mess.

That’s exactly the issue I’ve seen crop up with micro-mesh guards, especially in neighborhoods with a lot of maples or pines. The “never clog” claim sounds great, but in practice, the fine stuff—like those little maple seeds or pine needles—tends to mat right on top of the mesh. Water can’t get through, and you’re back to cleaning, just in a slightly different way. I’ve inspected a few homes where folks thought they’d solved the problem, only to end up with water sheeting over the gutter and pooling around the foundation. Not ideal.

About reinforcing older gutters: I’ve had mixed results. If the gutter is just sagging between hangers, adding more supports (like hidden hangers every 2 feet) can help a lot. But if the metal itself is warped or creased, straightening only goes so far. Sometimes you can gently bend it back with a block of wood and some patience, but it never really looks or functions like new. If you’re already seeing overshooting water during storms, that’s usually a sign the pitch is off or the lip is too deformed. In those cases, replacement might be the only way to get a reliable fix.

I get the temptation to just keep cleaning them out twice a year. It’s predictable, and you know what you’re dealing with. But if you’re noticing water damage or erosion near the foundation, it might be time to bite the bullet and replace the worst sections. I’ve seen too many folks try to patch and reinforce for years, only to end up with bigger headaches down the line—like rotted fascia or even basement leaks.

One thing I’d push back on: sometimes the cost of piecemeal repairs adds up to more than just replacing a run of gutter in the first place. If you’re already investing in guards and new hangers, it might be worth pricing out a full replacement for the worst side of the house. You might be surprised at how close the numbers are, especially if you can DIY part of it.

Anyway, just my two cents from crawling around too many ladders and attics over the years. Sometimes “good enough” is fine, but sometimes it’s just kicking the can down the road.


Reply
jakew61
Posts: 9
(@jakew61)
Active Member
Joined:

You nailed it with the “just scraping off a different kind of mess” line. I’ve seen that exact scenario play out more times than I can count—folks get those micro-mesh guards thinking it’s a set-and-forget deal, but then the leaves and needles just form a soggy mat on top. It’s like trading one chore for another, and sometimes it’s even trickier to clear off that wet layer without damaging the mesh.

I totally get the urge to keep patching things up, especially if you’re handy and don’t mind getting up there. There’s something satisfying about squeezing a few more years out of old gutters. But you’re right—once you start seeing water overshooting or pooling near the foundation, that’s a red flag. I’ve seen some pretty gnarly fascia rot and even mold in attics from gutters that just couldn’t keep up anymore.

One thing I’d add: sometimes folks underestimate how much a few extra hangers can help, at least in the short term. If the gutter’s just sagging a bit, tacking on hidden hangers every couple feet can buy you time. But if the metal’s already bent or creased, it’s usually a losing battle. I’ve tried the wood block trick myself—sometimes it works, sometimes you end up with a wavy mess that still leaks at the seams.

I do think you’re spot on about the cost of piecemeal repairs adding up. I’ve had customers surprised when they realize replacing a whole run isn’t much more than all the little fixes they’ve been doing for years. Especially if you’re comfortable with basic DIY—removing and hanging new sections isn’t rocket science, just takes patience and a good ladder.

At the end of the day, there’s no shame in sticking with what works for you, as long as you’re not ignoring bigger issues like water damage or erosion. Sometimes “good enough” really is good enough... until it isn’t. And hey, at least you’re paying attention before things get out of hand. That’s more than a lot of folks do.


Reply
Posts: 2
(@coffee183)
New Member
Joined:

“sometimes folks underestimate how much a few extra hangers can help, at least in the short term.”

Couldn’t agree more there. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve seen a gutter drooping just because it’s missing a couple hangers—easy fix, but people wait until the whole thing’s twisted like a roller coaster. That said, I’m not totally sold on the mesh guards either. In theory they’re great, but in practice... yeah, it’s just a new place for debris to camp out. I’d rather spend 20 minutes twice a year with a hose and call it good than deal with that soggy mat glued to the mesh. Sometimes low-tech is less headache.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@astronomy378)
Active Member
Joined:

I had the exact same debate with myself last fall. My gutters started sagging in the back, and when I got up there, it was literally just two missing hangers. Five bucks and 15 minutes later, problem solved. It’s wild how something that small can make the whole system look like it’s about to fall off the house.

About those mesh guards—I tried the cheap plastic kind on one section as a test. At first, they seemed to help, but by late November, I had this thick layer of wet leaves and pine needles basically glued on top. Ended up having to peel the whole mess off and clean underneath anyway. Kind of felt like double the work compared to just flushing it out with a hose.

I guess if you’ve got massive trees right over your roof, the guards might be worth it, but for me, a quick clean twice a year is way less hassle. Maybe if I had a two-story place or mobility issues, I’d think differently, but for now, low-tech wins.


Reply
Page 49 / 49
Share:
Scroll to Top