Notifications
Clear all

Torch-down roofs: saw a news piece about fire risks—thoughts?

322 Posts
311 Users
0 Reactions
4,410 Views
finn_runner
Posts: 17
(@finn_runner)
Active Member
Joined:

- Torch-down always makes me a little nervous, especially after seeing those news clips where a small spark turns into a full-blown fire.
- I’ve noticed inspectors are way more picky about torch-down installs lately—sometimes feels like they’re just looking for any excuse to ask for more paperwork or extra photos.
- Had one project where the fire marshal wanted proof of fire watches during install... never had that before.
- Curious if anyone’s actually had insurance push back because of torch-down? I keep hearing rumors but haven’t seen it firsthand.
- Also, does anyone else get owners asking why we can’t just “patch it with something cheap” instead of dealing with all this?


Reply
Posts: 9
(@dparker99)
Active Member
Joined:

Haven’t had insurance actually deny a claim over torch-down, but they do ask a lot more questions now—especially if there’s any fire history in the area. Owners always want the cheapest fix, but patch jobs rarely hold up long-term. Anyone else notice more fire marshals showing up lately?


Reply
Posts: 6
(@comics_apollo)
Active Member
Joined:

I get what you’re saying about patch jobs not lasting, but I’ve actually seen a couple hold up way longer than expected—especially when the crew took their time and didn’t just slap some stuff on. Not saying it’s the best route, but sometimes owners just can’t swing a full tear-off, especially with prices lately. I do think torch-down gets a bad rap sometimes. If you’re careful and follow the safety rules, it’s not automatically a fire hazard.

About the fire marshals, yeah, I’ve noticed more of them around, but I kinda get it. There was a small fire on a job near us last year (not even from roofing, just someone’s grill), and suddenly everyone’s on high alert. Insurance is definitely asking more questions, but I haven’t seen anyone get denied yet either. Maybe it’s just the times we’re in—people are more cautious, but I wouldn’t say torch-down is always the problem.


Reply
aexplorer49
Posts: 8
(@aexplorer49)
Active Member
Joined:

Patch jobs definitely get a bad rap, but I’m with you—sometimes they’re the only thing that makes sense when money’s tight. My place is pushing 30 years old and I’ve had to do a couple of “creative” repairs over the years. One spot on my flat roof got patched three years ago and it’s still holding up, knock on wood. Not ideal, but it beats buckets in the hallway.

Torch-down does make me nervous, though. I know it’s not always the villain, but I’ve seen a few close calls—one time a neighbor’s crew set off their smoke alarm and half the block came running. Still, if folks are careful and don’t rush, it seems pretty safe. The real issue is when someone tries to cut corners or skips safety steps just to save an hour.

Insurance is a whole other headache. Mine started asking for photos after every repair, which feels like overkill, but I guess they’re just covering themselves with all the stories in the news lately. Haven’t been denied anything yet either, but I feel like they’re itching for an excuse.

Honestly, if I could afford a full tear-off and new roof, I’d do it in a heartbeat. But until then, patch jobs and careful torch-down are just part of life for some of us. Prices are wild right now—got quoted almost double what my neighbor paid five years ago for basically the same job. Makes you wonder if waiting it out is worth it or if prices will ever come back down...


Reply
sjones69
Posts: 2
(@sjones69)
New Member
Joined:

That’s wild about the price jump—makes me wonder if I should’ve budgeted more for future repairs. My place is only about ten years old, but I’m already seeing some wear on the flat roof. I’ve been reading up on torch-down and it seems like a solid option if it’s done right, but the fire risk stories definitely give me pause. I’m not super handy, so I’d have to hire out, and the idea of someone waving a torch around up there is a little nerve-wracking.

Insurance hasn’t asked me for photos yet, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that starts soon. The last time I called about a minor leak, they wanted way more documentation than I expected. I get that they’re trying to avoid fraud, but it does feel like they’re looking for reasons to deny coverage.

Curious—has anyone here actually had their insurance deny a claim because of a patch job or torch-down repair? Or is it mostly just extra paperwork and hoops to jump through? Trying to figure out how much risk there really is before I commit to anything major...


Reply
Page 34 / 65
Share:
Scroll to Top