Notifications
Clear all

Thinking about replacing my roof—are shingles really worth it?

648 Posts
615 Users
0 Reactions
12 K Views
Posts: 12
(@filmmaker25)
Active Member
Joined:

I’m kinda in the same boat, trying to figure out if it’s really worth it to do the full tear-off or just layer new shingles over the old. My neighbor went the layover route to save money—looked fine for a couple years, but then they found soft spots and had to redo the whole thing anyway. Not sure if it’s just bad luck or what, but it’s making me second-guess the shortcut. The whole hidden damage thing is what freaks me out the most.


Reply
Posts: 16
(@lisabarkley243)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve dealt with more roofs than I care to remember, and honestly, the “shingles over shingles” shortcut always comes back to bite people. It’s like sweeping dirt under a rug and then wondering why it smells weird a year later. Sure, you save money upfront, but if there’s any hidden rot or soft decking, you’re just trapping it in there. The next time it rains sideways (which, if you live anywhere near me, is basically every other week), that hidden damage turns into leaks, mold, and a whole lot of headaches.

One building I managed had three layers stacked up—looked okay from the street, but when we finally did the tear-off, it was like opening a can of worms. Decking was so far gone in spots you could poke a screwdriver right through. Ended up costing way more to fix the mess than if they’d just done the full tear-off in the first place. Plus, most warranties won’t cover a layover job. Insurance companies love that loophole.

I get the temptation, though. Roofing isn’t cheap. But if you’re already shelling out for new shingles, might as well make sure you’re not just covering up a science experiment up there. It’s one of those “pay me now or pay me (way more) later” situations. I’d rather have a noisy week with the roofers than come home to a water feature in my living room.

Also—worth checking what your local codes say. Some places don’t even allow more than one layer anymore. And if you’re in an area with lots of wind or heavy snow, that extra weight and lack of proper sealing can really mess things up.

Long story short: shortcuts on roofs are like shortcuts in horror movies—never ends well for the homeowner.


Reply
Posts: 15
(@jamesstorm68)
Active Member
Joined:

“It’s one of those ‘pay me now or pay me (way more) later’ situations.”

That line really sums it up. I’ve been tempted by the “just put another layer on” option, especially when the quotes start rolling in and you see how much a full tear-off adds. But I had a neighbor go that route—looked fine for a couple years, then they found out the old roof underneath was rotting and it turned into a nightmare. Ended up costing them double what mine did, and they had to move out for a week because of the mold cleanup.

I get wanting to save money, though. Roofing isn’t cheap, and it’s hard to shell out for stuff you can’t even see most of the time. But hearing stories like yours makes me think it’s not worth the gamble. I’d rather stretch the budget now than risk a major repair down the line.

Out of curiosity, did you notice any difference in heating/cooling bills after doing the full tear-off? I keep hearing that having all those layers actually makes things worse for insulation, but I’m not sure if that’s just sales talk or if there’s something to it.


Reply
richardwanderer814
Posts: 16
(@richardwanderer814)
Active Member
Joined:

You’re right about the “just add another layer” approach—people think it’s a shortcut, but it can hide a lot of problems. As for insulation, it’s a common misconception that more layers help. In reality, old shingles trap heat and moisture, which can actually make your attic hotter in summer and lead to ventilation issues. I’ve seen folks in humid climates end up with higher cooling bills after a second layer. What kind of attic ventilation do you have? That can make a big difference, too.


Reply
staylor44
Posts: 13
(@staylor44)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s spot on about the heat and moisture. I’ve lost count of the houses I’ve seen where folks thought a second layer would save them hassle, only to end up with warped decking or even mold in the attic. One place comes to mind—a ranch in central Texas—where they’d added a new shingle layer after hail damage, thinking it’d be quicker. The attic was like a sauna by July and their AC just couldn’t keep up.

Ventilation really is the unsung hero here. Ridge vents, soffit vents... even those old turbine things can make a world of difference if they’re set up right. But sometimes people skip that step, or the vents get blocked with insulation. That’s when you start seeing those higher cooling bills and shingle problems.

I get why folks want to avoid the mess of a full tear-off, but leaving old shingles usually just kicks the can down the road. Plus, if you ever have storm damage later, insurance adjusters tend to look for shortcuts like that and it can complicate claims. Just something to keep in mind if storms are common where you live.


Reply
Page 68 / 130
Share:
Scroll to Top