Notifications
Clear all

Tearing off old shingles vs. layering new ones: which route did you take?

32 Posts
31 Users
0 Reactions
110 Views
math_max7579
Posts: 11
(@math_max7579)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the peace of mind with a full tear-off, but man, my wallet was screaming just thinking about it. I ended up doing a second layer instead—my old shingles were still in decent shape, and the inspector said the decking looked fine from below. Not saying it’s perfect, but in my case, it saved a chunk of cash and got me through another few years. If I find soft spots later, I’ll probably regret it... but for now, my roof and my bank account are both holding up.


Reply
Posts: 4
(@vr151)
New Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from—cost was a big factor for me too. I went with a tear-off, but only because my old shingles were curling and there were a few spots where the decking felt questionable. If your inspector didn’t see any issues from below, doubling up makes sense, especially if you’re not planning to stay in the house long-term. Only thing I noticed with a second layer (on my neighbor’s place) is it can get a bit hotter in the attic, and snow tends to slide off less easily. But if your roof’s holding up and you’re not seeing leaks, sounds like you made the right call for now.


Reply
aarontail709
Posts: 7
(@aarontail709)
Active Member
Joined:

I get why folks want to save money and just layer new shingles over the old ones—seems easy, right? But I’m always a bit wary of that shortcut, especially in places where storms are common. Here’s how I usually break it down, step by step:

First thing I check is the condition of the existing shingles. If they’re curling, cracked, or there’s any sign of rot or softness in the decking underneath, a tear-off is just safer. You can’t really spot every issue from inside the attic—sometimes water damage hides under those old layers.

Next up, weight. Two layers of shingles add a lot more load to your roof structure. Most houses can handle it, but if you’ve got an older home or questionable framing, it’s worth thinking twice.

One thing people don’t always consider: storm damage claims get tricky with double layers. Insurance adjusters sometimes push back harder on coverage or try to blame leaks on improper installation.

If you’re planning to stay put for a while, tear-off gives you peace of mind and a chance to fix any hidden problems. But yeah, if you’re moving soon and everything looks solid, doubling up can work... just know what you’re trading off.


Reply
jakewilson627
Posts: 3
(@jakewilson627)
New Member
Joined:

One thing people don’t always consider: storm damage claims get tricky with double layers. Insurance adjusters sometimes push back harder on coverage or try to blame leaks on improper installation.

That’s the kicker, honestly. I’ve seen folks get burned when a hailstorm hits—adjuster takes one look and says, “Well, two layers? Not covered.” Happened to my neighbor last year. He saved a grand up front but paid double that fixing it later. Sometimes shortcuts just circle back around…


Reply
Posts: 10
(@tiggermoon803)
Active Member
Joined:

He saved a grand up front but paid double that fixing it later.

That’s the part people don’t always factor in. I get why folks want to avoid the mess and cost of a full tear-off, but when you’ve got two layers, it’s not just insurance headaches—ventilation can suffer too. I’ve seen moisture get trapped between layers, especially in humid climates, and then you’re dealing with rot or mold down the line. Personally, I’d rather bite the bullet once than risk compounding problems later.


Reply
Page 6 / 7
Share:
Scroll to Top