Notifications
Clear all

How tricky is too tricky when fixing modern gadgets?

679 Posts
609 Users
0 Reactions
6,170 Views
Posts: 12
(@oreo_nomad)
Active Member
Joined:

I’m with you—sometimes the “smart” in smart gadgets just means more things to break. I’ve seen tenants get locked out of their own thermostats because the WiFi hiccuped, and then I’m stuck resetting passwords instead of just swapping out batteries. Manual switches might not send push notifications, but at least they don’t need firmware updates every other month. Tech’s great when it works, but when it doesn’t... yeah, give me a regular light switch any day.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@literature235)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a smart lock on my garage for a year—thought it was cool until it glitched during a power outage. Ended up crawling through a window in the rain. Honestly, sometimes a plain ol’ deadbolt just saves you a headache. Tech’s neat, but I’m not tossing my manual backups.


Reply
Posts: 3
(@birdwatcher18)
New Member
Joined:

That’s a rough situation—crawling through a window in the rain is about as far from “smart” as it gets. I get the appeal of smart locks, but I’ve always been wary of relying on anything that needs power or WiFi for basic access. I installed a smart deadbolt on my back door last year, and while it’s convenient, I kept the old keyed cylinder in place just in case. It’s not paranoia, just practicality.

Redundancy is underrated. Mechanical backups don’t care about firmware updates or outages. I do like the data logging and remote access features on some of these gadgets, but when things go sideways, nothing beats a good old-fashioned key. Maybe it’s overkill to have both, but after seeing my neighbor locked out during a network hiccup, I’m convinced it’s worth the extra step.

Tech is great when it works, but there’s something to be said for simplicity—especially when you’re standing outside in a storm.


Reply
architecture_charles4760
Posts: 14
(@architecture_charles4760)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of all these smart upgrades, but honestly, sometimes I think we’re just making things harder for ourselves. I tried a “smart” irrigation controller last year—supposed to save water, right? Instead, it glitched during a heatwave and my garden fried. Ended up dragging hoses around like it was 1995. I’m all for innovation, but if it can’t handle a power outage or a little rain, is it really progress? Sometimes old-school just works better.


Reply
Posts: 9
(@retro871)
Active Member
Joined:

Sometimes old-school just works better.

That hits home. I’ve seen the same thing with some of these “smart” roof vents and sensors folks are putting in now. In theory, they’re supposed to help you monitor leaks or attic temps from your phone. But what happens when the WiFi goes out in a storm? Or the app just decides to stop working after an update? Suddenly you’re up on a ladder in the rain, poking at something that used to just work by itself.

I get why people want the new tech—if it actually helps, that’s great. But I’ve replaced more than a few fancy solar attic fans that quit after a couple years, while the old-school wind turbines just keep spinning. Is it progress if you have to call tech support every time it rains?

Maybe there’s a sweet spot—some upgrades are worth it, but sometimes a simple manual switch or even just keeping an eye on things yourself is less hassle. Anyone else feel like we’re beta testing half this stuff?


Reply
Page 115 / 136
Share:
Scroll to Top