Notifications
Clear all

how much does fixing up after a big storm usually set you back?

971 Posts
856 Users
0 Reactions
14.9 K Views
fashion_max
Posts: 4
(@fashion_max)
New Member
Joined:

That’s exactly how it felt for me after a windstorm last year. I thought my policy would cover everything, but when the adjuster came out, he barely glanced at the damage and tried to write off half the repairs as “wear and tear.” I had to push back and show him photos from before the storm just to get a fair shake. Still ended up paying a chunk out of pocket for better shingles and ice shield—stuff I figured should’ve been standard with what I was paying.

Honestly, it’s frustrating. You pay for “peace of mind,” but then you’re left fighting for every dollar when you actually need help. I get that insurance companies have to watch for fraud, but sometimes it feels like they’re just hoping you’ll give up and accept less. If I hadn’t done some of the work myself, the bill would’ve been way higher. Makes me wonder if it’s even worth having the “premium” policy or if they’re all just playing the same game.


Reply
sdiver99
Posts: 4
(@sdiver99)
New Member
Joined:

I’m right there with you on the “premium” policy skepticism. When I bought my place last year, I figured paying extra for a top-tier policy would mean less hassle if something went wrong. Joke’s on me, I guess. We had a hailstorm this spring—nothing catastrophic, but enough to knock a bunch of shingles loose and leave dents in the gutters. The adjuster came out, spent maybe 15 minutes looking around, and then handed me a report that basically said “normal aging.” I had photos from inspection day (thank god for phone backups), and even then, it was a back-and-forth for weeks. Ended up with a partial payout that didn’t even cover half the estimate from the roofer.

I get that insurance companies have to draw the line somewhere, but it feels like they’re always looking for a way to minimize their end. The “wear and tear” excuse seems to be their go-to. It’s like, what’s the point of paying for coverage if you have to become a private investigator just to get a fair shake?

Cost-wise, I’m in the Midwest, and for a 1,600 sq ft roof, the quotes ranged from $8k for basic asphalt to $13k for upgraded shingles and ice/water shield. Insurance covered about $4k after my deductible and “depreciation.” I ended up biting the bullet and paying the rest out of pocket, mostly because I didn’t want to deal with patch jobs and future leaks. If I’d just gone with the bare minimum, maybe I could’ve squeezed by with a couple grand, but then you’re gambling on the next storm.

Honestly, I’m starting to think the only real “peace of mind” is having a fat emergency fund and not counting on insurance for anything but total disasters. The system just feels stacked against regular folks who actually try to maintain their homes. Maybe I’m being too cynical, but after this experience, I’m not sure I’ll ever trust an insurance company to do right by me unless I’m ready to fight tooth and nail.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@samsmith323)
Active Member
Joined:

That “normal aging” excuse drives me nuts too. I had a similar fight after a windstorm last year—adjuster barely glanced at the roof, then wrote up a report that ignored half the damage I’d documented. Ended up replacing a bunch of shingles myself just to avoid more leaks down the line. Out of curiosity, did you look into doing any repairs yourself, or was it all too much with the roof pitch and materials? Sometimes DIY can save a chunk, but I get not everyone’s comfortable up there.


Reply
lisasurfer
Posts: 4
(@lisasurfer)
New Member
Joined:

I hear you on the adjusters—sometimes it feels like they’re just checking boxes. I’ve patched up a few roofs after storms, but honestly, the steep pitch on my last place made me think twice. Ended up hiring someone for the trickier sections, but did the lower spots myself. Out of curiosity, what kind of shingles were you dealing with? I’ve found architectural ones hold up better in wind, but they’re pricier upfront.


Reply
josephartist765
Posts: 10
(@josephartist765)
Active Member
Joined:

Steep roofs are no joke—good call bringing in help for the high spots. I see a lot of folks try to tackle those themselves and it rarely ends well. As for shingles, you’re right about architectural ones holding up better in wind. They’re heavier and the layered design really helps. I’ve seen three-tabs just peel right off after a bad storm, especially on older homes. The upfront cost stings, but you might save yourself some headaches (and repairs) down the line. If you’re patching, matching the style can be a pain too—sometimes the color’s faded so much it’s impossible to blend.


Reply
Page 170 / 195
Share:
Scroll to Top