I’ll give recycled subfloor credit for not ballooning up after a rain, but I’ve seen seams get a little funky if you don’t clamp them down right away.
That’s been my experience too. Used recycled panels in a mudroom reno last year—thought I was being clever, but the smell lingered way longer than I expected. The seams were tricky, especially where the floor wasn’t perfectly level. Had to go back and re-clamp a couple spots after the first week because they started to curl up.
Honestly, I get why folks use it for moisture-prone areas, but for most jobs, I’d rather stick with standard OSB or plywood and just tarp it if rain’s in the forecast. Less hassle, and I don’t have to air out the house for a month. Maybe it’s just me, but sometimes “eco-friendly” comes with more headaches than it solves.
Honestly, I get why folks use it for moisture-prone areas, but for most jobs, I’d rather stick with standard OSB or plywood and just tarp it if rain’s in the forecast.
I hear you on that—my last attempt at “green” subfloor had my whole basement smelling like a wet cardboard box for weeks. Did you notice any difference in how it held up to foot traffic before you got the finish floor down? I swear mine felt a little spongier than regular OSB, but maybe that’s just in my head. Curious if anyone’s actually had recycled stuff outlast the standard panels, or is it just a tradeoff for the eco points?
I’ve had the same doubts about the recycled panels. Tried them once in a mudroom reno and honestly, they did feel a bit softer underfoot before the tile went down. Didn’t notice any real durability issues, but I kept wondering if I’d regret not just using regular OSB. The eco angle is nice, but if it means replacing stuff sooner, I’m not sure it’s worth the hassle or the smell. Sometimes saving a few bucks up front just isn’t worth the tradeoff.