Interesting points, but I'm not totally convinced clearer documentation alone would solve the issue. I've worked on a couple of jobs where the plans were crystal clear—down to insulation thickness and joist spacing—and we still ran into moisture problems. One time, we followed specs exactly, but the materials delivered weren't quite what was ordered (supplier mix-up), and nobody caught it until after installation. Another time, everything matched perfectly, but the site conditions changed mid-build due to unexpected weather delays.
I think sometimes it's less about documentation and more about having someone experienced on-site who can spot when something's off—even if it's subtle. Plans are great, but real-world conditions rarely match perfectly. Maybe instead of investing heavily in mock-ups or overly detailed diagrams, we should focus more on training crews to recognize early signs of moisture buildup or ventilation issues? Just my two cents from what I've seen out there...
"Plans are great, but real-world conditions rarely match perfectly."
Couldn't agree more with this. I've inspected plenty of homes where everything looked perfect on paper, but subtle issues cropped up anyway—usually due to unexpected site conditions or minor oversights during installation. Training crews to spot early warning signs is key. Documentation helps, sure, but nothing beats experienced eyes on-site catching those small details before they become big headaches...
