Notifications
Clear all

Roof checkups saved me big bucks—anyone else?

889 Posts
789 Users
0 Reactions
30.2 K Views
Posts: 15
(@eric_phillips6061)
Active Member
Joined:

I've been thinking about drones for roof checks too, but I'm still a bit skeptical. Last summer, I was helping out on a job where the homeowner had relied solely on drone inspections for a couple years. From above, everything looked pretty decent—no missing shingles or obvious damage. But once we got up there, we found several spots where the flashing around vents and chimneys was starting to deteriorate. Small stuff, yeah, but it could've turned into leaks pretty quickly.

Have you noticed drones missing these kinds of subtle issues? Or maybe it depends on the drone's camera quality or who's operating it? I'm curious if upgrading equipment or training would make a noticeable difference...


Reply
naturalist19
Posts: 15
(@naturalist19)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally agree—drones are handy for a quick overview, but they're not great at catching subtle details like flashing issues or minor caulking deterioration. Even with high-end cameras, it's hard to spot those tiny cracks or lifted edges unless you're physically up there poking around. Better gear or training helps, sure, but nothing beats an experienced set of eyes and hands-on inspection for those sneaky little problems...especially around chimneys and vents.


Reply
illustrator92
Posts: 24
(@illustrator92)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yeah, drones are great for a quick glance, but I've found they're just not enough when it comes to spotting those sneaky leaks or worn-out flashing. Had a drone inspection once that missed a tiny gap around my chimney flashing—ended up costing me big later on. Now I always insist on a hands-on check. Curious though, has anyone had luck combining drone footage with thermal imaging to catch hidden moisture issues? Seems like it could be useful, but maybe I'm overthinking it...


Reply
amandam26
Posts: 20
(@amandam26)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I've actually tried thermal imaging with drones a few times, and honestly, it's pretty handy—especially after a big storm. Regular drone footage missed some moisture buildup under shingles at my place, but the thermal images showed clear cold spots where water was hiding. Still, it's not foolproof; you gotta double-check suspicious areas yourself. Bottom line: combining both methods gives you a solid starting point, but nothing beats climbing up for a closer look...


Reply
tea811
Posts: 13
(@tea811)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally agree about thermal imaging—it's a valuable tool, especially post-storm. But I'd add that regular visual inspections still have their place. Thermal scans can miss subtle issues like cracked flashing or loose fasteners, which might not show clear temperature differences. I've found combining drone tech with periodic manual checks is ideal. Also, don't underestimate preventive measures like green roofing; vegetation layers can significantly reduce moisture buildup and extend roof lifespan. Worth considering if you're looking for long-term solutions.


Reply
Page 43 / 178
Share:
Scroll to Top