Notifications
Clear all

ROOF DAMAGE DILEMMA: ASPHALT VS METAL, WHICH IS BETTER FOR INSURANCE CLAIMS?

155 Posts
147 Users
0 Reactions
2,529 Views
jerrypilot9934
Posts: 14
(@jerrypilot9934)
Active Member
Joined:

Green roofs definitely have their quirks—you're right about the maintenance factor. I've done a bit of digging into this myself, and from what I gather, insurers can be pretty cautious about moisture-related claims on green roofs. A buddy of mine installed one a few years back and had some minor leak issues after heavy rains. His insurer covered it, but only after he proved he'd kept up with regular inspections and maintenance logs...bit of a hassle, honestly.

Seems like insurance companies are still figuring out how to handle these setups, so documentation is key. But don't let that scare you off completely—when done right, green roofs can be awesome for insulation and stormwater management. Just gotta stay on top of things and keep detailed records in case something goes sideways.


Reply
literature_donna
Posts: 16
(@literature_donna)
Active Member
Joined:

You're spot on about insurers being cautious with green roofs—I've run into that a couple of times myself. Had a client about two years ago who went the green roof route, and while it looked fantastic and performed great for insulation, he had a similar hassle with insurance after some heavy storms. It wasn't even a major leak, but the insurance company wanted proof he'd been meticulous about maintenance. Luckily, he was pretty organized, so it worked out in the end.

Honestly, though, documentation is becoming more important across the board, not just with green roofs. Even traditional asphalt or metal roofs can trigger insurance headaches if you don't have your ducks in a row. I've seen plenty of cases where insurers push back on claims because homeowners couldn't show regular inspections or maintenance records—even when the damage was clearly storm-related.

That said, I wouldn't necessarily shy away from green roofs if you're drawn to them. They're definitely more hands-on than asphalt or metal, but the benefits can be worth it if you're prepared for the upkeep. Metal roofs are pretty solid too—durable, great lifespan, and insurers generally like them because they're resistant to hail and wind damage. Asphalt shingles are still the most common, though, so insurers are comfortable dealing with them and claims tend to be straightforward.

Bottom line is, whatever roofing system you choose, just keep detailed records and stay proactive about inspections. It might seem tedious at first, but trust me—if something goes wrong down the line, you'll thank yourself later.


Reply
fashion261
Posts: 10
(@fashion261)
Active Member
Joined:

"Metal roofs are pretty solid too—durable, great lifespan, and insurers generally like them because they're resistant to hail and wind damage."

Totally agree here. Recently switched to metal myself—insurance premium dropped slightly, plus less hassle after storms. Initial cost stings a bit, but long-term savings and peace of mind seem worth it...


Reply
nscott70
Posts: 9
(@nscott70)
Active Member
Joined:

"Initial cost stings a bit, but long-term savings and peace of mind seem worth it..."

Yeah, that's usually the trade-off. I've inspected plenty of homes post-storm, and metal roofs consistently hold up better—fewer dents, less shingle debris scattered around. Insurance adjusters definitely notice that stuff. The upfront price can be tough to swallow, but seeing homeowners avoid the headache of frequent claims makes me think it's a smart move overall. Glad it's working out for you so far.


Reply
Posts: 11
(@politics357)
Active Member
Joined:

Metal roofs definitely have their perks, but I've seen cases where hail damage on metal isn't as obvious initially—sometimes it takes a trained eye to spot subtle dents. Asphalt shingles might show damage quicker, making claims straightforward...just something to keep in mind.


Reply
Page 13 / 31
Share:
Scroll to Top