Notifications
Clear all

Could Skipping Roof Checkups Cost You Your Claim?

160 Posts
157 Users
0 Reactions
3,775 Views
waffles_lee
Posts: 14
(@waffles_lee)
Active Member
Joined:

I totally get where you’re coming from. Most folks I know don’t have a neat folder of inspection reports either—half the time, people can barely find their last repair invoice. But I’ve seen insurance companies get real nitpicky, especially after a big storm. Had a tenant once who swore up and down he’d kept up with roof maintenance, but when it came time to file a claim, the adjuster wanted proof of regular inspections, not just receipts for patch jobs. Photos and repair bills help, but sometimes they want that paper trail. It does feel like overkill, but I guess they’re just looking for any reason to deny a claim...


Reply
rivercarter981
Posts: 18
(@rivercarter981)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I get the frustration with insurance companies digging for any excuse to deny a claim, but I’m not convinced they always need a stack of inspection reports. Maybe it depends on the company or even the adjuster you get. I’ve had a few claims over the years—hail damage, one bad windstorm that ripped up a bunch of shingles—and I’ve never been asked for more than photos and receipts from repairs. No one’s ever demanded a formal inspection report, at least not in my case.

That said, I do try to keep a few before-and-after pictures on my phone when I get work done, just in case. It’s not fancy, but it’s better than nothing if someone asks. My neighbor had a different experience, though—his insurer flat-out denied a claim because he’d let moss build up and hadn’t done anything about it for years. They said it was “neglect,” which seems like a gray area. He didn’t have any proof he’d even looked at the roof in ages.

I guess what I’m saying is, regular checkups are smart, but I wouldn’t lose sleep over not having a perfect folder of inspection paperwork. If you’re keeping up with obvious repairs and can show some kind of record—photos, invoices, maybe even an email from your roofer—that usually goes a long way. The only time I could see it really biting you is if there’s clear evidence you ignored something major.

Plus, in some places (I’m in the Midwest), insurance companies seem more lenient after big storms because they know everyone’s getting hit at once. But if your roof is already in bad shape before the storm, that’s when they start looking for reasons to say no.

Long story short: do what you can to keep some records, but don’t stress if you’re not running your house like an office. Just don’t ignore stuff that could turn into a bigger problem down the line.


Reply
art_rain
Posts: 9
(@art_rain)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally agree, you don’t need to treat your roof like a crime scene with every receipt and inspection in a binder.
- I’ve had claims go through with just some quick pics and a note from the guy who patched things up.
- Neglect is where they get picky—if there’s moss or missing shingles for ages, that’s when they start sniffing around for reasons to deny.
- Midwest storms are wild, but as long as you’re not ignoring obvious stuff, you’re probably fine.
- I just snap a few photos after repairs and call it good... hasn’t failed me yet.


Reply
environment_william
Posts: 11
(@environment_william)
Active Member
Joined:

Neglect is where they get picky—if there’s moss or missing shingles for ages, that’s when they start sniffing around for reasons to deny.

That’s spot on. I’ve seen folks lose out on claims because they ignored a little moss or let a leak go too long. Insurance adjusters aren’t looking for perfection, but if your asphalt shingles are curling up and there’s a tree growing out of your gutter, they’ll call it “lack of maintenance” in a heartbeat. I always tell people—snap a few photos when you patch something, but don’t skip the occasional look-over, especially after a big storm. It’s not about keeping a binder, just showing you care.


Reply
finns40
Posts: 11
(@finns40)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a client last year who figured a little moss was “just cosmetic”—didn’t touch it for years. When a windstorm finally peeled back half his shingles, the adjuster took one look and said nope, claim denied. They pointed right at the green patches and said it showed he hadn’t kept up with basic care. He tried to argue, but honestly, the roof looked rough even from the street.

I get why people put it off—climbing up there isn’t fun, and sometimes you don’t notice problems until they’re big. But insurance folks are quick to call out neglect if there’s obvious stuff like missing shingles or clogged gutters. Doesn’t matter if you’ve paid premiums for decades.

I’m not convinced you need to document every tiny fix, but I do think snapping a photo after patching a leak or clearing debris is smart. It’s just proof you’re not ignoring things. After hail or heavy rain, I’ll walk around my own place and check for anything new—doesn’t take long.

One thing I see a lot: folks in wetter climates get moss way faster than they expect. Asphalt shingles especially seem to hold onto it. If you’re in the Pacific Northwest or anywhere damp, that stuff can creep up quick and start lifting edges before you know it.

Not saying everyone needs to be obsessive about their roof, but if you let things slide too long, insurance will use it against you. Seen it happen more than once... and those repairs out of pocket aren’t cheap.


Reply
Page 9 / 32
Share:
Scroll to Top