Notifications
Clear all

Could Skipping Roof Checkups Cost You Your Claim?

160 Posts
157 Users
0 Reactions
3,506 Views
Posts: 17
(@law_pumpkin)
Active Member
Joined:

“doesn’t matter how fancy your tech is if you don’t have a record.”

This right here is the part that gets me. I thought I was being all clever with my new phone and a million photos of my roof, but when I actually had to file a claim last year (hail, of course—thanks, Texas), the adjuster wanted to see proof I’d been keeping up with things, not just a bunch of “look, it’s raining again” shots. I ended up digging through old texts to my dad about patching a shingle just to show I’d done *something*.

I’ll admit, I was a little skeptical about the whole drone thing at first. Seemed like overkill for a regular house, but after seeing what my neighbor’s drone picked up on his roof—cracks and missing bits I couldn’t see even from a ladder—I’m kinda sold. My roof’s got a weird pitch, and I’m not exactly dying to break my neck for a better look. Still, I get a little paranoid about privacy, so I’m not flying anything over the neighbor’s yard.

One thing I’d add: don’t assume your insurance company will be reasonable just because you’ve got photos. I had a friend who got denied because his pics were “too blurry” (seriously, how do you even argue with that?). Now I make sure to get close-ups and wide shots, and I write the date on a sticky note and stick it in the frame sometimes. Feels silly, but whatever works.

And yeah, the “after every storm” advice is gold. I used to just do spring and fall, but after last summer’s hail, I’m out there every time the sky looks angry. My camera roll is 90% roof and 10% my dog looking confused.

Anyway, skipping checkups is just asking for trouble. I learned the hard way that insurance folks will use any excuse to wiggle out of paying. If you’re lazy like me, just set a reminder on your phone. It’s way less hassle than fighting a denied claim.


Reply
Posts: 3
(@benmagician)
New Member
Joined:

That’s exactly it—insurance companies are just looking for a reason to say no. I used to think snapping a few pics after a storm was enough, but when I actually had to file a claim (wind damage, not hail, but same headache), they wanted dates, proof of repairs, even receipts for the $12 tube of roof sealant I bought at Home Depot. I’m not the most organized person, so now I just keep a folder on my phone with everything—photos, receipts, even screenshots of weather alerts.

I hear you on the drone thing. My neighbor’s got one and he offered to help me out, but I’m still a little weirded out by flying cameras. I just use a selfie stick and zoom in from the ground... probably looks ridiculous, but it gets the job done for now.

One thing I’d add—if you’re on a tight budget, you don’t have to hire someone every time. I found a local handyman who does quick roof checks for way less than a roofing company charges. Worth it for peace of mind, especially if you’re not comfortable climbing up there yourself.


Reply
Posts: 4
(@mythology_ginger8253)
New Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of hiring a handyman for quick checks—definitely cheaper than a full inspection. But I’ve seen cases where insurance pushed back because the person checking wasn’t licensed or didn’t document things in a way the adjuster wanted. One neighbor had a handyman’s handwritten note, and the insurance company basically shrugged it off. Not saying it’s never worth it, but sometimes that “peace of mind” can be a bit shaky if you ever have to fight for your claim. I guess it depends on how picky your insurer is...


Reply
Posts: 15
(@shadowm79)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I’ve seen insurance get real picky about who signs off on things. My uncle tried using a buddy’s “inspection” after a hailstorm and got nowhere with his claim. Sometimes saving a few bucks upfront just means headaches later... especially if your roof’s already borderline.


Reply
aaron_dust
Posts: 13
(@aaron_dust)
Active Member
Joined:

- Insurance companies really do dig into the paperwork when it comes to claims. I’ve seen folks get denied just because the inspector wasn’t licensed or missed a few photos.
- Cutting corners on inspections can backfire. Sometimes people think a quick look-over is enough, but if you’re dealing with older shingles or patchy repairs, adjusters spot that right away.
- I get wanting to save money, but in my experience, a legit inspection up front usually pays off—especially after storms. Seen too many “buddy” reports tossed out by insurance.
- Not saying every pro is perfect, but at least there’s a paper trail if something goes sideways later.

Curious—has anyone actually had an insurance company send out their own inspector and disagree with your contractor’s report? That seems to happen more than people expect... especially after big hail events or when roofs are already pushing their lifespan.


Reply
Page 14 / 32
Share:
Scroll to Top