Notifications
Clear all

ROOF SURVIVED HURRICANE, BUT WAS IT JUST LUCK?

890 Posts
803 Users
0 Reactions
32.9 K Views
jackrider317
Posts: 17
(@jackrider317)
Active Member
Joined:

Quick inspections might not catch everything, but they’ve saved me from bigger headaches more than once.

That’s the truth—sometimes it’s the little things you spot early that save your bacon. I always tell folks, if you see a pile of granules in the gutter, it’s like your roof’s version of thinning hair... not a crisis yet, but worth watching. Ever tried using binoculars for a closer look from the ground? It’s not glamorous, but it beats playing “roof ninja” and risking a tumble. Curious if anyone here has actually switched to metal after years with shingles—did it live up to the hype, or just drain the wallet?


Reply
gingercoder760
Posts: 22
(@gingercoder760)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Ever tried using binoculars for a closer look from the ground? It’s not glamorous, but it beats playing “roof ninja” and risking a tumble.

Yep, I’m all about the binoculars—no way am I climbing up there unless I have to. After the last storm, I found a couple of shingles curled up at the edges, but nothing major. Looked into metal, but the price tag made me pause. I get the appeal, but for me, patching and regular checks have stretched my shingle roof way longer than I expected. Maybe not fancy, but it works for my wallet.


Reply
gardening_ryan
Posts: 12
(@gardening_ryan)
Active Member
Joined:

Binoculars are underrated, honestly. I’ve seen too many folks get hurt trying to play hero on a slippery roof, especially after storms. Regular ground checks and patching have kept a lot of my properties going longer than the “experts” predicted, so I get where you’re coming from. Shingles aren’t glamorous, but if you’re on top of maintenance, they can surprise you.

That said, I do think there’s a point where patching becomes a false economy. If you’re seeing curled edges after every big storm, it might be time to budget for something more durable, even if it’s not metal. There are some decent mid-range options now—architectural shingles, for example, hold up better than the basic 3-tabs and don’t cost as much as metal.

I’ve also noticed insurance companies are starting to push back on claims for older roofs, even if you’ve kept up with repairs. Just something to keep in mind... sometimes “good enough” only works until it doesn’t. But yeah, for now, if patching is working and you’re not seeing leaks, I’d ride it out too.


Reply
aspenj82
Posts: 18
(@aspenj82)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the patching vs. replacing debate. I’m in the same boat—my place is pushing 18 years with the original 3-tab shingles. After last year’s hurricane, I was convinced I’d be dealing with leaks, but somehow it held up. I do regular patch jobs and keep an eye out for missing tabs, but lately I’ve noticed more edges curling up after every storm. Makes me wonder if I’m just delaying the inevitable.

I looked into architectural shingles too, but even the mid-range stuff adds up fast once you factor in labor. Metal sounded great until I saw the quotes... yikes. Insurance is another headache. Mine just sent a letter saying they’ll only cover “functional damage” now, whatever that means. I guess I’ll keep patching for now, but I’m starting to think luck’s got more to do with it than I’d like to admit.


Reply
gingermusician
Posts: 11
(@gingermusician)
Active Member
Joined:

Eighteen years on 3-tabs after hurricanes? That’s Olympic-level luck. I’m always patching too, but those curled edges are like shingles waving a white flag. Insurance “functional damage” is code for “good luck, buddy.” I keep telling myself I’ll upgrade, then see the quotes... and nope.


Reply
Page 35 / 178
Share:
Scroll to Top