Notifications
Clear all

Lowered my insurance bill after a roof inspection—anyone else surprised?

570 Posts
540 Users
0 Reactions
4,164 Views
jfluffy16
Posts: 10
(@jfluffy16)
Active Member
Joined:

- That’s solid, especially since you said,

“I haven’t had a single leak (and normally I’d have patched at least once by now).”
Not having to patch is a win in my book.
- I was skeptical about low-VOC too, but I actually noticed less of that chemical smell lingering after repairs. Didn’t expect it to make much difference, but it’s definitely easier on the nose.
- If it’s helping with leaks and air quality, that’s a double bonus. Insurance companies probably like anything that means fewer claims, even if they don’t say it outright.
- I’ll admit, I used to just grab whatever was cheapest at the hardware store. Might rethink that now.


Reply
Posts: 1
(@williampodcaster1862)
New Member
Joined:

Not having to patch is a big deal, especially if you’re used to chasing leaks every season. Low-VOC stuff surprised me too—less stink, and it seems to hold up just as well. Sometimes paying a bit more up front really does pay off in the long run.


Reply
simba_harris
Posts: 5
(@simba_harris)
Active Member
Joined:

I’m right there with you on the upfront cost being worth it in the long haul. I used to think all that “premium” talk was just sales fluff, but after switching to higher-grade shingles and a low-VOC underlayment, I haven’t had to mess with a single patch in three years. Used to be, every spring I’d find at least one spot that needed attention—usually after a nasty rainstorm.

The insurance discount was a nice surprise for me too. Didn’t expect them to care about the materials, but apparently they do if you show receipts and photos. I will say, though, not every “eco” product has held up for me. Tried a cheaper low-VOC sealant once and it cracked within a season. Lesson learned: some things are worth paying extra for, others not so much.

Anyway, fewer leaks and less stink in the house is a win in my book. Makes me wonder why I waited so long to upgrade instead of patching over and over...


Reply
Posts: 7
(@ashleybrewer4385)
Active Member
Joined:

Can’t argue with the results—fewer leaks is always a plus. I see a lot of folks surprised by those insurance discounts after roof upgrades, but it makes sense from their end. Better materials mean less risk for them. One thing I’d add: sometimes people go all-in on “eco” without checking durability ratings, and that’s where issues crop up. Not every green label is equal. I’ve seen high-end underlayments outlast the shingles themselves, but cheap sealants or flashing can ruin the whole job. Upfront cost stings, but patching year after year adds up faster than most realize.


Reply
Posts: 2
(@wafflese30)
New Member
Joined:

Not sure I’m totally sold on the “better materials = less risk” thing across the board. My neighbor shelled out for all these “hurricane-rated” shingles after the last big storm, and two years later, he’s still dealing with weird leaks around the vents. Installer swore by the brand but cut corners on flashing, I guess. Sometimes it’s less about what you buy and more about who’s putting it on your roof… or maybe that’s just my luck talking. Either way, insurance gave him a break too, but now he’s paying for repairs anyway.


Reply
Page 43 / 114
Share:
Scroll to Top