Notifications
Clear all

Feeling good about my switch to composite tiles—worth it?

805 Posts
764 Users
0 Reactions
13.8 K Views
jturner12
Posts: 7
(@jturner12)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, the “recyclable” label cracks me up sometimes—like, sure, in theory, but where’s the actual bin for these things? I manage a few buildings with composite roofs and honestly, the low maintenance is a game changer. I used to spend half my spring chasing down blown-off shingles after every windstorm. The upfront cost stings, but not having to call roofers every year is worth it. Still waiting for our city to catch up on recycling options though... right now it feels like wishful thinking.


Reply
simbah12
Posts: 13
(@simbah12)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally get what you mean about the “recyclable” label—feels more like a suggestion than an actual option most days. I switched to composite tiles a few years back after a nasty hailstorm shredded my old asphalt roof. Haven’t missed chasing after loose shingles either. The price tag hurt at first, but not having to climb up there every spring is a huge relief. Still, I do wish the city would step up with better recycling programs... right now, it’s just landfill or nothing.


Reply
Posts: 17
(@medicine_zeus)
Active Member
Joined:

Composite tiles are a solid move, especially after hail damage. I see a lot of folks in my area (Midwest) making the same switch after storms—those asphalt shingles just don’t hold up like they used to, and the maintenance gets old fast. The upfront cost can sting, but you’re right: not having to patch or replace shingles every year adds up in time and money saved. Plus, composite tends to handle temperature swings and UV exposure better than standard asphalt.

You’re not alone on the recycling frustration. “Recyclable” labels can be misleading, especially when local facilities aren’t equipped to process certain materials. I’ve seen a few cities try pilot programs for shingle recycling, but it’s hit or miss. It’d be great if more municipalities stepped up, but until then, landfill is often the only option—which isn’t ideal.

One thing I’ve noticed with composite roofs is that they’re less prone to granule loss and curling, so you get a longer lifespan and fewer headaches. Some brands even offer impact ratings that help with insurance premiums, depending on your provider. Worth checking if you haven’t already.

If you ever do need repairs down the line, just make sure whoever works on it knows their way around composites—they’re not quite the same as asphalt or wood shakes when it comes to installation or patching. But overall, sounds like you made a smart call for your situation. Less time on the ladder is always a win in my book.


Reply
Posts: 15
(@dance331)
Active Member
Joined:

Less time on the ladder is always a win in my book.

Couldn’t agree more. I switched to composite a few years back after a nasty hailstorm shredded my old shingles, and honestly, I haven’t missed the constant patch jobs one bit. The recycling thing bugs me too—my city talks a big game but barely takes anything. Still, the peace of mind with composites is worth it. You made a solid call, even if the upfront cost stings at first.


Reply
kim_hiker
Posts: 6
(@kim_hiker)
Active Member
Joined:

- Composite’s definitely easier on the maintenance side—less climbing, fewer surprise leaks.
- Curious, did you notice any difference in noise during storms? Some folks say composites are quieter than metal or even asphalt, but I’ve had mixed feedback from customers.
- Upfront cost is a hurdle for a lot of people, but it tends to balance out with fewer repairs down the line.
- The recycling thing...yeah, that’s still a pain. Wish more cities would step up.
- Did you go with a specific brand or style? Some of those newer composites look almost like slate or shake—pretty wild how realistic they’re getting.


Reply
Page 41 / 161
Share:
Scroll to Top