Notifications
Clear all

Composite Shingles vs. Asphalt: Which Would You Trust Over Your Head?

283 Posts
275 Users
0 Reactions
4,344 Views
Posts: 12
Topic starter
(@megan_lopez)
Active Member
Joined:

Trying to decide between composite shingles and the regular asphalt ones for a roof replacement this summer. The house is in upstate NY, so we get all the weather—snow, rain, summer heat, you name it. I’ve heard composite shingles are supposed to last longer and look a bit fancier, but then again, they’re pricier and I’m not sure if they’re really worth it for a pretty average ranch house.

On the flip side, asphalt seems like the classic choice. Cheaper upfront, but I’m worried about having to replace them sooner (my current asphalt roof is only 15 years old and already curling). Does composite really hold up better in places with heavy snow and ice? Or is it just hype and not worth the extra cash? If anyone’s lived with both, or has strong opinions either way, I’d love to hear what tipped the scales for you.


282 Replies
Posts: 6
(@pphillips71)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from—upstate NY weather can be brutal on a roof. I’ve been in your shoes, weighing cost vs. durability, and to be honest, after two rounds with asphalt shingles (both started curling and shedding granules by year 12 or so), I finally bit the bullet and went with composite last time around.

Yeah, they cost more upfront. No denying that. But the difference in peace of mind is real. My current composite roof’s been through four winters now—ice dams, heavy snow, wild temp swings—and it still looks new. No curling, no missing pieces after those crazy windstorms we get in March.

If you’re planning to stay put for a while, I’d say the extra money is worth it long-term. Less hassle with repairs, plus they do look a notch nicer (which actually helped when my neighbor sold his place). For an average ranch, it might feel like overkill, but honestly, not having to worry about another replacement for decades? That’s a big deal in my book.

You’re not wrong to hesitate at the price tag, but if you’re already seeing issues at 15 years with asphalt, composite isn’t just hype—it really does hold up better around here.


Reply
Posts: 13
(@dandbroofing_services)
Active Member
Joined:

Great question — especially for upstate NY where your roof sees everything from freeze–thaw cycles to heavy snow loads. Both composite and asphalt can work, but they perform very differently long-term.

From what I’ve seen working alongside D&B Roofing Services, the biggest difference isn’t just lifespan — it’s how each material handles temperature swings and moisture. Composite shingles generally resist curling, cracking, and granule loss better than standard asphalt, especially in climates with harsh winters. That’s one reason many roofers in Glen Allen and surrounding areas have been recommending them more often, even though our winters down here aren’t as extreme as yours.

Asphalt is definitely the budget-friendly option, but your situation sounds familiar — curling around the 15-year mark is pretty typical. We’ve also seen homes with roof damage on Midlothian where cheaper asphalt shingles broke down early because of repeated freeze–thaw cycles or poor attic ventilation.

If you plan to stay in the house for a while, composite tends to give better long-term value and fewer headaches. If you’re looking for the lowest upfront cost, asphalt still gets the job done — just expect a shorter service life.

If you don’t mind sharing, what brands are you currently comparing? Sometimes the specific manufacturer can make a big difference.


Reply
wafflesbirdwatcher
Posts: 8
(@wafflesbirdwatcher)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of composite, but I’ve managed a few properties with higher-end asphalt shingles that held up surprisingly well—20+ years, even with rough winters. I think attic ventilation and install quality matter just as much as the shingle type. Sometimes, folks swap to composite and still run into issues if those basics aren’t right.


Reply
Posts: 12
Topic starter
(@megan_lopez)
Active Member
Joined:

I think attic ventilation and install quality matter just as much as the shingle type.

I hear you on the ventilation and install quality—my last place had a “lifetime” asphalt roof, but the attic was a sauna in summer and ice dam city in winter. Didn’t matter what shingle I picked, they started curling after about 12 years. Moved to a house with composite (DaVinci, I think) and honestly, it’s held up better through two nasty winters so far—no curling, no granule loss, and it does look sharper. But yeah, the upfront cost was a gut punch.

If you’re planning to stay put for a while, composite might be worth it just for the peace of mind. If you’re thinking of moving in 10 years, I’d probably stick with a good asphalt shingle and make sure whoever installs it actually knows what they’re doing. Either way, don’t skimp on attic insulation or ventilation—learned that the hard way.


Reply
Page 1 / 57
Share:
Scroll to Top