Notifications
Clear all

Torch-down roofing: saw a scary accident on local news

25 Posts
25 Users
0 Reactions
474 Views
Posts: 6
(@finn_roberts)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally agree, torch-down isn't something to mess around with.
- Seen plenty of DIY fixes turn into bigger headaches later...
- Even pros slip up occasionally—insurance claims from torch-down mistakes spike after storms.
- Sometimes better safe than sorry.

Reply
Posts: 6
(@scottm51)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, torch-down definitely isn't DIY-friendly. Out of curiosity, has anyone noticed if certain roofing materials or brands have fewer issues overall? I've seen some contractors swear by specific products, claiming they're safer or easier to handle... but then again, maybe that's just marketing hype. Makes me wonder if there's actual data or studies backing any of it up. Either way, seems like torch-down is one of those things best left to someone who really knows their stuff.

Reply
dcampbell60
Posts: 7
(@dcampbell60)
Active Member
Joined:

- I've wondered about that myself... contractors I've talked to definitely have their favorites, but I haven't seen any solid data backing it up either.
- In my experience, torch-down is just inherently riskier because of the open flame involved—no matter what brand or product you're using.
- A few years ago, I had a flat roof redone, and the roofer pushed hard for TPO instead of torch-down. Claimed it was safer, easier to install, and less prone to leaks over time.
- I did some digging back then, and there seemed to be anecdotal agreement online, but nothing really concrete or scientific.
- Makes me think manufacturers might not want that data out there—could cut into their sales if certain products were clearly shown to be safer or more reliable.
- Curious if anyone's come across actual industry studies or independent testing comparing safety records or ease of installation between torch-down and other flat roofing systems?

Reply
mechanic63
Posts: 7
(@mechanic63)
Active Member
Joined:

I've seen plenty of arguments for TPO being safer too, but honestly, it's not always black-and-white. Torch-down definitely has risks—open flames and roofing materials aren't exactly best friends—but a skilled, experienced crew can minimize most hazards. Haven't stumbled across concrete studies myself either, just a lot of manufacturer claims and anecdotal evidence... makes me wonder, does anyone know if insurance companies have published any data or guidelines related to this? Seems like they'd have skin in the game.

Reply
joshuanebula275
Posts: 13
(@joshuanebula275)
Active Member
Joined:

"makes me wonder, does anyone know if insurance companies have published any data or guidelines related to this? Seems like they'd have skin in the game."

Funny you mention insurance companies—when I was getting homeowner's insurance for the first time last year, my agent specifically asked about torch-down roofing. She didn't outright say it was a dealbreaker, but she did hint that premiums could be higher because of the open flame risk. They definitely keep track of claims and accidents, so I'd bet they have some internal data they're basing that on.

If you're curious about specifics, you could always call your insurance company directly and ask if they have guidelines or recommendations. Sometimes they'll even send you a checklist or something similar. I ended up going with TPO myself (mostly because open flames and me don't mix well... trust me), but like you said, a skilled crew probably makes all the difference.

Reply
Page 5 / 5
Share:
Scroll to Top